Who's the first guy to achieve "greatness" in each division?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Apr 13, 2012.


Page 1 of 2
  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,308
    Sep 15, 2009
    So i'm looking for the man who set the bar for greatness division by division.

    I'll give it a go and see if anyone disagrees.

    Hw: sullivan
    Cw: holyfield
    Lhw: fitz
    Smw: jones
    Mw: dempsey
    Lmw: hearns
    Ww: barbados
    Lww: locche
    Lw: mccauliffe
    Sfw: arguello
    Fw: dixon
    Sbw: gomez
    Bw: mcgovern
    Sflw: watanabe
    Flw: wilde
    Lflw: chang
    Stw: lopez

    Thoughts?
     
    lufcrazy, Apr 13, 2012
    lufcrazy, Apr 13, 2012
    #1
  2. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    I'm not sure Fitzsimmons achieved greatness at light-heavy. Fighting as a lhw was a minor thing towards the end of his career, I think. And that title had little prestige until sometime later. I think.

    Jack McAuliffe came before Gans.

    Roy Jones Jr. was great at super-middle.

    Heavyweight there might be someone before John L. , like Jem Mace.
     
    Legend X, Apr 13, 2012
    Legend X, Apr 13, 2012
    #2
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,308
    Sep 15, 2009
    Who at lhw then?
    Greb?

    I'm not well versed on mcauliffe.

    I don't think jones was great at smw. Nor was mace at hw.
     
    lufcrazy, Apr 13, 2012
    lufcrazy, Apr 13, 2012
    #3
  4. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Possibly Greb at lhw, possibly Jack Dillon.

    I absolutely believe Jones was great at super-middle.
    His win over Toney was world-shaking, it stood above the division - and the division was strong at the time.
     
    Legend X, Apr 13, 2012
    Legend X, Apr 13, 2012
    #4
  5. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    luf you've been making some great threads lately. keep it up!

    and imo jones was absolutely great at 168. i can see the argument against it based on resume, longevity, etc.

    however in the end he's by far the greatest/most talented fighter in the divisions history
     
    Nightcrawler, Apr 13, 2012
    Nightcrawler, Apr 13, 2012
    #5
  6. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,481
    4,910
    Aug 19, 2010
    BW - Dixon, perhaps
    SFlW - Jiro Watanabe?
     
    Vic-JofreBRASIL, Apr 13, 2012
    Vic-JofreBRASIL, Apr 13, 2012
    #6
  7. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Featherweight should either be Abe Attell or Terry McGovern.
     
    LittleRed, Apr 13, 2012
    LittleRed, Apr 13, 2012
    #7
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,308
    Sep 15, 2009
    Fine! Jones it is at smw.

    Dixon at fw

    Mcgovern at bw

    Watanabe at sflw
     
    lufcrazy, Apr 14, 2012
    lufcrazy, Apr 14, 2012
    #8
  9. amhlilhaus

    amhlilhaus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,840
    12
    Mar 24, 2005
    jem mace was a jobber jabroni.

    the first great heavyweight was broughton, figg didn't have enough documentation on his career.
     
    amhlilhaus, Apr 14, 2012
    amhlilhaus, Apr 14, 2012
    #9
  10. TheLockerRoom

    TheLockerRoom Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Apr 12, 2012
    No, Roy Jones Junior was a great fighter at SMW. He did not achive greatness at SMW! He used it as a stop over, on his way to LHW.
     
    TheLockerRoom, Apr 14, 2012
    TheLockerRoom, Apr 14, 2012
    #10
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,308
    Sep 15, 2009
    I don't know, you know.

    He really set the standard for consistency in the division.
     
    lufcrazy, Apr 14, 2012
    lufcrazy, Apr 14, 2012
    #11
  12. TheLockerRoom

    TheLockerRoom Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Apr 12, 2012
    I'd argue that he lacks a resume there sir. He may have the greatest win in the history of the division with Toney, but it seems silly to give this honour to a man who wasn't in the division very long.
     
    TheLockerRoom, Apr 14, 2012
    TheLockerRoom, Apr 14, 2012
    #12
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,308
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well sir i'd contend that achieving such a great victory in a new division is achieving greatness.

    Like hearns over duran at lmw.
     
    lufcrazy, Apr 14, 2012
    lufcrazy, Apr 14, 2012
    #13
  14. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    How about Philadelphia Jack O'Brien for Light Heavyweight?
     
    ThinBlack, Apr 14, 2012
    ThinBlack, Apr 14, 2012
    #14
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,308
    Sep 15, 2009
    I considered him, but i'm not convinced he actually did that much at the weight.

    He was embarrassed by burns and he lost to langford and ketchel I believe.

    Can't recall from top of my head which indicates to me he wasn't great.
     
    lufcrazy, Apr 14, 2012
    lufcrazy, Apr 14, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 2