who's the most overrated past fighter ever?

i think its harry greb. bro i read a thread on this website saying he would have beaten robinson h2h. there's not even any footage of greb to even make that a valid or a reasonable speculation. "he was too fast" "he was too skilled" is that what u guys READ about him? im done atsch:rofl:roll:

who else is heavily overrated for no valid reason?

 

Is he too white for you brah?

I've read that he didn't exist and white people made him up.

White people are the devil :hey

 

hell yeah:tong

 

i think duran was the weakest link out of the fab-four

 

oh i was right. haha bye friend :hi:

 

the greb vs robinson thread is completely unreasonable... have u read what people were posting? it's lunacy. there's no footage of him at all. u can't speculation someone u have never seen. they base their speculations on what they have read even though news clippings about him were made in his era. bottom line is his era was all offense and little defense and technique. i made that conclusion from watching fights from the early 1900s. its crazy

 

no he is not.... he was good for his era, would have jack johnson been good in ali's era(era of the heavyweight) FCK NO, he was too sloppy, compare the fighters in ali's era and compare the fighters from jack johnson's era, the fighters from ali's era looked so much more balanced and more disciplined, better footwork everything seemed a little more whats the word ADVANCED. i don't understand the the overratedness(that's not even a word) of the past fighters, but they paved the way so i respect them but i dont fall under the impression that past fighters did anything better, they were tougher yes, but not more skilled.............. HELL NO :verysad