Who's the technically better boxer Pacquiao or Cotto?

He wouldn't be knocking on his door, he would have kicked it down, stormed right in, boned his wife and laid a turd on his pillow.

 

Maybe the question should be who among the great fighters is technically worse than Pacquiao. Pacquiao is not really known for his technical prowess. He is more famous being called a "one dimensional fighter".

 

cotto easily

 

cotto.

 

Cotto by far!

 

cotto easily

 

If you say cotto is technically better than Pac. I can respect that.
but if you say pac is one dimensional...

One dimensional is a myth! Ever wondered that the so called Technically skilled JMM never won over the so called one-dimenisional pac?!

MAB never won over one dimensional pAC
Morales - after winning the first fight...was demolished by pac in the next two outings...

after losing to morales he never had an L. Do you have any idea hown many W's pac got after that L with Moralas. Sorry I lost count...You still call that one-dimensional?!

Only pac haters will call him one-dimensional that's for sure!:good

 

cotto is more technical..
and thats why i like Pac, because he isnt technical but he gets the job done.

 

not true. pac now throws a mean right hook counter on the backfoot. just look at the 2nd and 3rd morales fights.

 

Miguel Cotto is the better boxer of the two.

Manny is more of a pretender. He isn't really a boxer, he's a slugger.

 

if pac is still a 1-D fighter right now, then that will make both hatton and juan diaz 1/2-D.

 

i think pac is more of a puncher since he throws combos and some counters. a slugger is more like valero, ponce de leon, katsidis, etc.

 

Cotto.

 

Cotto by a fair distance.

 

Cotto