Who's win is better?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by radab, Apr 30, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    134
    Jul 20, 2004
    STFU Snitch.
     
    bladerunner, May 1, 2009
    bladerunner, May 1, 2009
    #16
  2. nhojrem

    nhojrem Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,436
    0
    Jan 4, 2009
    pac
     
    nhojrem, May 1, 2009
    nhojrem, May 1, 2009
    #17
  3. beecho1988

    beecho1988 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    Hatton
     
    beecho1988, May 1, 2009
    beecho1988, May 1, 2009
    #18
  4. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    So all in all. You really don't have any proof that Hatton is shot. The Lazcano fight is moot, when Ricky looked impressive against Paulie irregardless of what you think about Paulie's punching power(I mean if Lazcano is a light-puncher, then Paulie would have atleast hurt him as well, right?)

    A shot fighter wouldn't have looked that fast and coordinated with his punches as Ricky showed in the Paulie fight. He would've been tired as hell in the mid rounds if that's the case and Paulie would've landed alot more. So tell me, what exactly did you see in the Paulie fight that made Hatton shot?
     
    Sting, May 1, 2009
    Sting, May 1, 2009
    #19
  5. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    Hatton is NOT shot. He's at his peak..
     
    FINITO, May 1, 2009
    FINITO, May 1, 2009
    #20
Page 2 of 2