Who's win over Malignaggi was more impressive?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by JFT96, Aug 4, 2010.


  1. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Quite possibly, I was away the week before the fight and didn't see how market moved late on before the fight.
     
  2. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    Hatton. He won every round and made paulie look silly. Khan looked sloppy for the first half of their fight, missing with most of his punches. Ricky really put on a boxing display against Paulie.
     
  3. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010

    Well there's a shocker. Hatton didn't actually "outmuscle" him that much, he actually used his jab well at times, like Khan did. He also rocked the younger, fresher Paulie a few times, which I don't remember Khan doing. Hatton forced Paulie to fight like a *****, he was hanging on for dear life at times.

    Hatton easily the more impressive performance.
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
  5. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    I didn't vote but what's interesting is that Malignaggi, although he was gracious after the Hatton fight has never given him full credit for the win and has refused to accept that Hatton is better than him. He's talked about being badly prepared, not his usual self, and that he was with the wrong trainer and that's why he lost. Contrast that with his comments after the Khan fight where he made no excuses and said that in his whole career he has only fought two elite fighters-Cotto and Khan. Now this doesn't mean that Malignaggi is being truthfull but there you go. Maybe he just cannot accept that fact that he was beaten by somone considered a brawler. Hatton was supposed to be stronger and tougher but not a better boxer. Malignaggi is known as "the dude who punches like a girl" but one thing he does take pride in is his boxing ability. In his mind he can be outmuscled but he's not supposed to be outboxed by someone like Hatton. It happened though and that must be hard for him to take.
     
  6. Derrytucker

    Derrytucker Member Full Member

    452
    0
    Nov 4, 2009
     
  7. mryeags

    mryeags Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,588
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    Agreed :good
     
  8. Jaso

    Jaso Active Member Full Member

    914
    0
    May 23, 2010
    Khans was more impressive because Paulie was coming off a good win against Diaz and was a much better fighter under Sherif Younan
     
  9. It's very hard to seperate them really. They're both impressive. Paulie is no mug.
     
  10. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    I'd say Khan as Hatton was a nightmere stylewise for Paulie, plus Paulie was in better shape and form vs. Amir.
     
  11. bluenoseshf

    bluenoseshf Active Member Full Member

    1,084
    1
    Apr 1, 2009
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I really don't think Hatton implemented his usual style against Paulie. He managed to beat Paulie with less handspeed, being less fresh, and probably nearing the end of his physical prime.

    So, Hatton. Amir had all the advantages over Paulie, I said that before the fight happened, as did most of us. Joke of a fight.
     
  13. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    Khan's victory is better, Paulie had looked impressive in his previous bouts.
     
  14. WhamBam

    WhamBam Keeping Cool Full Member

    2,134
    0
    Jul 30, 2010
    why do ppl even talk about malinaggi his best win was over a small lightweight who had no buissness at 140
     
  15. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Cotto outboxed Paulie for large stretches. It wasn't just a muscle job.