1. pacquiao 2. marquez 3. calzaghe but in reality 1 and 2 are interchangable though. call it 1a and 1b.
Juan Manuel Marquez for me on the grounds that I had him winning the rematch with Manny Pacquiao, and a TKO win over Casamayor is more impressive than a knockout win over Diaz. 1. Juan Manuel Marquez 2. Manny Pacquiao 3. Joe Calzaghe
LOL. But seriously, I've said ever since the Pac fight that JMM won that fight and should at least be pfp #2, but really thought he should be pfp#1. Who's a better boxer? I can't think of anyone. Willie Pep, but he's kind of out of the running these days. JMM is an artist.
hands down. :yep he doesn't need resume. just see his tremendous skills and and he is p4p#1 bar none. heck he doesn't need to fight to be ranked at #1.
pac. mainly becuase i felt the first round of pac/jmm 2 decided which side of the fence you were on. and if you made a clear decision on that round i dont know what to say. I scored a draw
I think its funny, Pac brutally mauls 29-30 year old versions of shot Mab and Morales and he gets derided while JMM TKO's a 38 year old who should have lost his last 2 fights and al of a sudden he's suppose to be better than Pac? Aaaah whatta buncha hypocrites...
No, I think that many if not most people thought that JMM outpointed Pac- just like the first fight- but Pac is the big $$ fighter and so he got the nod.