calzaghe closely followed by pacman,i really dont feel hopkins should be as high,if hes four hes a long distance away from cal,that is 12 rounds from him.
wasnt that over a blown up lightmw? didnt he lose twice to an absolute b level fighter,that everyone on this forum continues to rubbish as a never was. has joe ever lost a fight?werent bhops two best wins over two blown up welters?i mean his resume is as fishy as your mothers clit after a night on the town.
bhop was robbed against taylor it doesnt matter...those blown up welters and jmw are HOF fighters...he also beat a top 10 p4p fighter in Tarver... what has joe done that is better than what bhop has...also who has he fought that are in the same league as the fighters on bhops resume
What on earth is this crap?? There's some serious issues going on with some elements of the human race.
so does it really not take some legitimacy of his wins if they were guys fighting well over their natural weight?for me it most certainly does,i mean kessler would have a good chance against anyone between 160-175,he beat the second coming of tyson in lacy(he was the favourite remember), he beat an ATG in eubank.if kessler and eubank were american they would be huge! hes defended his belt 21 times,hes cleaned out a division recently,hes unified the belts,he has a record of 44-0. you could say tarver is comparable to lacy and he has been severely found out,he was only a p4per cos of his nationality.who has bhop beat at lhw?nobodies. bhop is most certainly a legend but he is not a top boxer anymore.i really cant see the bhop of today troubling a hungry calzaghe.
I dont think Bernard Hopkins at this stage in his career is anywhere close to top 10 p4p fighters around. Floyd Pacquiao Calzaghe