Whose improved more since they fought? Froch or Pascal?

I started a similar thread a few months back, and I thought Pascal was the one who had developed to be a better fighter. But the Dawson, Hopkins and Abraham fights on, I'm shifting to Froch.

When they eventually have a rematch, I think Froch will beat him easily.

 

froch

 

Pascal. But he's still not at the level people think, he's not elite.

Knew the Dawson fight was a bit misleading and knew he'd lose to Hopkins.

Bow down to me.:bowdown:bowdown:bowdown




I'm joking btw, nobody go off on one (About the bowing, not about the rest).

 

Pascal, slightly.

Froch has the edge in opposition since their bout...but has also been made to look ordinary at times. I believe his win over Abraham, we didn't really see an improvement in Froch...he just boxed and followed a good gameplan.

 

After watching the Hopkins fight, I would say its 60/40 to Froch in a rematch.

 

Yep I agree- he was always capable of that we just haden't seen it in his past performances. When he met a monster power puncher in Abraham he had to use his style in another way. This is why I was so comfortable Margarito would stop Cotto late- I knew Cotto would have to box as no one could keep up with the relentless Margo fighting like he normally did. Surprised how well he did but he made mistakes (Mosley showed how you do it). Still won me £120 so I can't complain

 

froch is a game fighter he keeps getting better . i'd say froch

 

Froch, slightly.
So maybe their rematch (if it ever comes to that) will end up 117-111 (3x) now instead of 116-112 (3x).

 

Froch, look at his wins.. Direll,Abraham..