Froch Vs Pascal (WBC 168.)Jermain Taylor W TKO 12 ........ (WBC 175) UD 12 W Adrian Diaconou (WBC 168.)Andre Dirrell W SD 12 ........ (WBC 175) TKO 10 W Silvio Branco (WBC 168.) Mikkel Kessler L UD 12 ........ (WBC 175) TD 12 W Chad Dawson (WBC 168.) Arthur Abraham W UD 12 ........ (WBC 175) MD 12 D Bernard Hopkins
I started a similar thread a few months back, and I thought Pascal was the one who had developed to be a better fighter. But the Dawson, Hopkins and Abraham fights on, I'm shifting to Froch. When they eventually have a rematch, I think Froch will beat him easily.
Pascal. But he's still not at the level people think, he's not elite. Knew the Dawson fight was a bit misleading and knew he'd lose to Hopkins. Bow down to me.:bowdown:bowdown:bowdown I'm joking btw, nobody go off on one (About the bowing, not about the rest).
Pascal, slightly. Froch has the edge in opposition since their bout...but has also been made to look ordinary at times. I believe his win over Abraham, we didn't really see an improvement in Froch...he just boxed and followed a good gameplan.
Yep I agree- he was always capable of that we just haden't seen it in his past performances. When he met a monster power puncher in Abraham he had to use his style in another way. This is why I was so comfortable Margarito would stop Cotto late- I knew Cotto would have to box as no one could keep up with the relentless Margo fighting like he normally did. Surprised how well he did but he made mistakes (Mosley showed how you do it). Still won me £120 so I can't complain
Froch, slightly. So maybe their rematch (if it ever comes to that) will end up 117-111 (3x) now instead of 116-112 (3x).