Whose record is most deceptive when you look only at the win-loss ratio?

Crazy Horse Bennet. The guy can beat anyone at the weight at any given time.

 

Agree 100%. Insane run if you include those two. Shields was such a sloppy and disappointing bout neither man deserved it IMO, but Hitman was robbed against Sanchez. Dana agreed with the decision:-(

 

He should've been gone a long time ago. Didn't make it to the TUF Finals and loses his first two fights via STOPPAGE and doesn't get cut? **** you, Dana White. Beats Escovedo who was 1-4 in his 5 fights before their matchup. Attempts to jerk off Figueroa - Herb Dean don't play that ****. Beats Page who was on a 3 fight losing streak. His fight with Tezuka was nothing close to impressive.

EDIT: Dana White's mindset, not mine:
"Oh, but he's Bruce Leeroy. And the lower weight-classes need all the exposure they can get."

 

Hong Man Choi 2-3 (Fedor, Crocop, Minowa)

 

Provided they give up within 2 minutes

 

Figueroa, milked the **** out the "low blows." He easily should have gotten that decision. I recall him being pretty dominant in that fight. He isn't a top guy yet, why would he be fighting top guys? He beats people that are around his level, and generally they are guys that have a lot of experience over him. He was annoying on the show, but he clearly improved in every way since, and that includes his attitude. Plus, nobody looks at an 8-5 record and thinks "hey, this guy must be good." If anything, he is better/more talented than his record lets on.

Sounds like you just don't like the guy.

 

**** no I do not. :good

 

Mike Bisping IMHO has a padded record which is rare in MMA

 

Travis Fulton 300+ fights and around 50 losses

 

26-16-1-2NC

This content is protected

Lynchburg

 

55-10-1NC

This content is protected

Lynchburg

 

16-14

This content is protected

Lynchburg

 

50-28-7-1NC

This content is protected

Lynchburg

 

Rampage 32-10

 

the ronin :happy:happy:happy