Whose victory of De La Hoya was LEAST impressive?

I'd agree with it too, I might switch Pac/Floyd around just for how dominant Pac was though.

 

Trinidad, he got beat bad early and then won when Oscar ran so when Oscard did his thing Trinidad di bad a fight neither guy can be proud of

 

I wouldn't really argue against anyone swapping the two, Pacquiao's victory was incredible in the sense he jumped up and was so dominant against a heavy favourite. However we do have the hindsight of seeing just how shot de la Hoya was. Like I said though wouldn't have a problem with the two being swapped.

 

mayweather was very unimpressive. It seemed if Oscar stepped on the gas earlier he would have won. Floyd did not do much damage to Oscar and he let Oscar get off way too many shots. I expected Floyd to win easily.

 

Whitaker...

but then again, Whitaker makes good boxers look average.

 

Best win in boxing since Duran/Leonard. :deal

 

Misunderstood it man, thread is about WHOSE VICTORY OVER de la Hoya was the LEAST impressive. Consensus so far seems to be Mosley II or Trinidad.

 

The Hopkins victory, because DLH blatantly took a dive.

That fight is tainted forever because of that.

 

Pac. Because he fought the most faded version anyone has ever fought of DLH.

 

Tito and Mosley II. But DLH coasting the final rounds in both fights cost him.

 

True, true. Floyd faced a better Oscar but Pac beat him much more convincingly. I wouldn't fuss too much about either being better.

 

There should of been a rematch with him and Trinidad. Trinidad didn't do enough I think to get the victory on that night. So I was not impress with the out come.

 

Mosley 2 and Pac

 

One of the two I underlined! DLH really won those..