Why a Guzman-Funeka Draw is reasonable

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PowerPuncher, Nov 30, 2009.


  1. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    You're spot on...that's what I've been telling people since the fight happened. It just seems like Funeka got robbed because he was so dominant during the rounds that were obviously his. Also the state of Guzman's face didn't help. But people should consider what might have happened if Funeka didn't elbow him in the face breaking his nose, and headbutting him causing that deep wound over his eye. Makes a huge difference obviously. Watch the first two rounds; Guzman seems like a different fighter.
     
  2. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    :patsch
     
  3. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    EPIC FAIL.

    Guzman looked great in rounds 1 and 2. From 3 on out, it was pretty much Funeka winning the fight.
     
  4. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    :patsch
     
  5. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    Were you watching the fight with your eyes open or were you like using the force?
     
  6. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Ignore this idiot, he also said Pac/Mab II was a robbery.
     
  7. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    alot of fights that have been draws were reasonable. this one was not. funeka edged it out. has guzman been the one on the other side and made funeka's face look liek that and be so dominant late then everyone would say guzman was robbed if it were scored a draw,