Why are English fighters on the butt end of everyones jokes here?

Was the Uks hype of Calzaghe any different to way Dirrell and Ward are getting hyped by some?

 

You might want to read my response to that mental giant. Hopefully, your reading comprehension skills will be better than those of your writing skills.

Cheerio, *******.

 

Wow, that was clever, you Scottish ****.

Haven't you some sheep to ****, you cheap *******??

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

:good

 

Quite honestly, I am dubious about that figure as well. However, there is no doubt that tens of millions of Indians, at the very least, suffered "avoidable" deaths during British interference in India.

 

I think all countrys overhype thewir fighters, its just national or local pride. Its for sure not just the UK tho, atm look at how america acting over Dirrell and Ward. Ward beats a faded Kessler and everyone goes nutes, yet in same breath every 45sec is thread after thread detailing how all the ppl calzaghe thought was overhyped or old ect ( One of which was a much much harder version of Kessler).
And Dirrell lol, we get told daily how bad Froch is, like ultra ultra caveman bad, yet he beat Dirrell ? or lost a close fight if u dont beleieve he won. Yet Dirrell got most talent seen for years!!!!!!!!. If it came to point where he could lose a robebry close desicon to worst boxer ever, how is he classed as so good?

 

This content is protected

 

After muddling though your jumbled boxing post, I have come away unimpressed.

Review any respectable list of the top 10 fighters of all-time. Is the UK represented proportionally to the United States??

I submit that the answer is "no." Any more questions?

 

****in annoying and ridiculous that the whole nationality thing keeps coming up. i am british, and i happily take the **** out of haye because hes a ***, khan because he wont touch anyone that could challenge him, and froch because he's an annoying *****.

Furthermore, my favourite active fighters include two americans, a filipino and a mexican. so what does nationality have to do with anything? If someone is there to be taken the **** out of with legitimate reason like, imo, haye and khan, then i will do it, wherever they come from.

 

That's how most overhyped Brits end up.

See Khan

 

Yes let us ignore my Dirrel and Ward points like always.

 

I don't think its right to blame the British for Cyclones, Droughts & Landslides.

That doesn't seem fair.

What next, them Hurricane's that batter that East Coast of the States are man made, by the British under the Irish sea?

 

I agree. Theres some serious hype for these two, none of it justified yet. Very similar to Joe C.

 

im not even going to repsond other than to say this, their were less than 1.8 billion people on the planet at the time, am i supposed to believe that we killed more than the entire population of the planet in just India inside 200 years, those figures dont even add-up, surely you can see that. Prove we killed 1.8 billion in india in one way or another, prove it...just like you ask me to prove Chavez, go ahead, Ill await your 'proof'.....I bet you side step.

Aiding a rival group isnt colonialism, but it still reulted in 50,00 deaths, paid for by your country.

I see you conventiantly side-stepped the Haiti 04 coupe

As for the 02 Chavez coupe....within 10 seconds of Camaro getting in you ''recognised him as leader'' that tells you all you need to know, lasted a whole 48 hours though.

 

or see Jeff 'next Tyson' Lacy.