Why are English fighters on the butt end of everyones jokes here?

:huhwhen did you address my question arsehole.

 

suddenly grow a set?:huh:rofl:rofl:roflwhat the **** are you on about.i think you need medication......for narcissism.you typical yank twat.

 

blow you? are you that devoid of female contact.:verysad:verysad

 

unimpressed?as i say,when you have more fighters to pick from it makes it that much easier doesn't it.my point was that i didn't do too bad....considering.

 

You asked for a source on India, and I provided it. Again, did I say killed or did I use the word "avoidable" deaths?

There may have been 1.8 billion people at the time, but how many millions (perhaps billions) of Indians were born over the duration of British involvement?? Rather than a static number, it is an ever increasing number.

Personally, I think the Indian figure is a bit high myself. However, there is NO dispute that British interference in India-- and I haven't even counted Africa, the Middle East et all-- resulted in the deaths of tens millions of Indians.

How many Africans died under the yoke of British colonialism? How many Middle Easterners died under the yoke of British colonialism?? I could go on, and on, and on , and on.

Fifty thousand people were killed in Nicaragua? And? Are you suggesting that there wouldn't have been violent opposition to the Sandinista regime without American involvement? Moreover, how the **** do you think the Sandinistas gained power? Yeah, that would be in large part through Cuban and Soviet funding.

Glad to see you quickly back pedal on your "colonialism" accustation on that front, however.

Perhaps you ought to consider Northern Ireland as well. How many people were killed per the funding of the British military and intelligence services in your dirty little war in Northern Island? And what was that for? Containing the world from Soviet/Soviet allied expansion? :rofl

Try answering my questions for change.

Your proof of our overthrowing Chavez is that we recognized a rival leader over a known and avowedly bellicose, anti-American despot??? :rofl:rofl:rofl Wow-- now that's what I call air tight. :rofl:rofl:rofl

I, at least, cited the work of a published author when I made the 1.8 billion allegation.

I didn't side step the Aristide "coup." Other than his accusation, much like Chavez's, you have dick to support your allegation. Just like you have dick to support your Australian allegation.

 

Hardly. Proportionally, the UK has not kept pace with the United States. Period.

What more must I say?

 

Go back and re-read the threads.

You are having undue difficulty keeping up, huh?

 

Yawn.

But yes, I think I need medication as well. There has got to be something wrong with me for wasting my time on you.

 

Answer my question about how come USA allowed to hype up Dirrell and Ward then!

 

see michael grant,don curry,zab judah,kelly pavlik,jeff lacy,tommy morrison,gerald mcclellan,shane mosley,paulie malignaggi,steve cunningham,
jermain taylor,riddick bowe,ricardo williams and your batch of heavyweights
over the last 5 years.

not forgetting dominick guinn:rofl:rofl:hi:

 

:happy:happy:happy

 

hardly?**** off.you picked possibly the five greatest fighters in american history.i didn't do too badly when you consider that.

 

Touch a nerve, you little two-bit douchebag???

What is this, ****ing horse-shoes or hand grenades, were we give pats on the back from coming close?

I picked the five greatest fighters in American history? Wrong, douchebag, I picked some of the greatest fighters in human history.

As I said, the UK cannot match the USA either in numbers or proportionally.

Now run along and bore someone else.

 

Sugar Shane?? Are you on ****ing crack, you idiot?

Shane is an excellent fighter, always has and always will be.

The point that is so tragically lost on you, as you huff and puff like the little engine that could, is that many Americans did not rate a number of the fighters you listed particularly high to begin with.

Have you been privy to any of the Pavlik threads over the last two years, for example? Conversely, Brits almost uniformly ball-fondle their fighters at an unprecedented level.

Therein lies the difference.

 

How has Ward not lived up to his billing to date??

Do tell.