Why are Pac fans so quick to forget about the Morales loss?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Martini643, Aug 19, 2009.


  1. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008

    Because they are running out of excuses and anything to throw to discredit Pac.
     
  2. jianne

    jianne OWNAGE Full Member

    837
    0
    Dec 5, 2008

    :lol: it's like saying Torrecampo would KO hoya earlier and also hatton beacause Torrecampo beat pac.
     
  3. jianne

    jianne OWNAGE Full Member

    837
    0
    Dec 5, 2008

    that's the exact word.... :good:deal
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i never forgot about it. i bet a couple of bucks for morales and that was the only time i won betting against pac. :lol:
     
  5. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    3,612
    3
    Nov 30, 2008
    :lol:
     
  6. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    So he lost to Morales, so what? There is no shame in losing to another ATG. Especially when you subsequently go on to beat him twice.
     
  7. Sean101

    Sean101 Active Member Full Member

    1,392
    1
    Oct 11, 2008
    Beat me to it :deal
     
  8. mangler

    mangler Active Member Full Member

    742
    2
    Aug 19, 2008
    Pac lost to EM in 2005. Loss was legit and unarguable, but Pac is much better as a fighter by now. That loss means nothin anymore.
     
  9. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    Forget what? This is actually 1 of my favorite Pac fights.
    1. He earned my utmost respect in this fight by showing grit and heart despite the cut.
    2. He earned lots of fans in this loss.
    3. and Muhammad must have put a lot of money on MOrales in this fight.
     
  10. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    The reason why people bring it up is because Morales had loss his previous fight before that. Hence Morales wasn't the dominant force people make him out to be.

    Just as was the case when Morales fought Pac the 2nd time, once again Morales was coming off a loss.

    CAN YOU SEE THE PATTERN:patsch
     
  11. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    It means that Pac can be outboxed by a better BOXER:patsch!!!
     
  12. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    The gloves, the cut, the new weight class....all where contributing factor to his loss. There is also the fact that Pac avenged those losses and he has improved quite a bit since then.

    Great great win by Morales but I honestly cant say that was the best circumstances for pac that night nor was he at his best, technically and with the new weight class, possibly even physically.
     
  13. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Morales came off a loss to Barrera....lol. wow if you're gonna use that as excuse to determine he was past it. For your information, Morales also lost to MAB even earlier than that, IN HIS PRIME....he must have been past it in the fights after that. lol.

    Pac anihilated MAB, then went straight on to JMM, got a draw and JMM was a ***** about the negotiations so they opted for Morales. MAB, JMM & Morales all when they were at top of their game...
     
  14. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008
    OMG haters are running out of excuses!!!!!!
     
  15. jianne

    jianne OWNAGE Full Member

    837
    0
    Dec 5, 2008
    :yep
    and they are using those loss...

    and even including that loss with torrecampo. :lol::lol: