Why are Pac fans so quick to forget about the Morales loss?

Morales had no legs in the second fight. Because of Pacquiaos brutal assault to his body. If he was shot how was able to stand toe to toe with Pacquiao for 10 rounds? Hatton couldn't even get to the 3rd round with Pacquiao.

Morales was outboxed by Barrera and Raheem. They never really beat him brutally. He was just beaten by movement and counter punching. He was even laughing at the end of those fights. Because Barrera and Raheem never hurt him all that much.

 

good post scar:thumbsup

 

Forget? Who's forgetting it? It's in his record and will never be forgotten.

 

Thanks. :good

 

No discrace in losing to Morales. Pac showed how much he improved since then with two kayos of Eric.

 

well, i'll gladly use that logic if he loses to Cotto and Mayweather. the ringwars of fighting Erik Morales and JMM have taken its toll on Pacquiao. He wasn't in his prime because he took so many shots.:-(

yeah, Morales wasn't the same again when he beat Pac in 2005. get real.

Funny thing is Pac hasn't been in a tough fight since 2005. Pac took some shots to the head from JMM II but he hasn't been in trouble. He's not been seriously rocked where he's been put on ***** street.

 

now i am the one who is pea branded..

of course you have to give credit pac after the fight (thank you) BUT... you just wanna save your ass. easy, right? go back to the mainstream and as if nothing happened. Duh.

i dont care if you made 300 predictions, but looking at pac you are just a dickhead. i dont make up my posts against you. i just copied and pasted yours in its original form. dont be so sensitive as if you are having your period. it is pretty straightforward to read you and where are you going....

you are creating your own grave man..... :good

 

the second morales fight showed me pac was two dimensional...the second marquez fight showed me he's gifted

 

And the Hatton fight showed he is special.

 

certainly made me a believer:good

 

I acknowledge that PAC lost to Morales on their 1st meeting. Thusm, there was a rematch. PAC beat Morales on their 2nd meeting. 3rd meeting in inevitable. PAC demolished Morales in 3rds.

It's ackowledged and I look at the fight based on the trilogy. For your info, PAC has improved a lot since his lost to Morales. Thanks for Morales PAC learned a lot. He is now a better boxer.

Based on his performance in the last 10 fights, it's no longer stupid to think PAC can beat PBF if they meet. If you ask me 5 yrs ago. I will say PBF beats PAC. If you ask me NOW! I believe PAC can beat PBF.

This is also not a hate thread.

 

Really. The second Morales fight showed me once again Pac could get out boxed. He clearly loss the first 6 rounds until father time caught up with Morales.

People seem to forget that when Pac loss the first time against Morales, Morales was already coming off a recent loss to Barrera for the 2nd time.

Also when Pac beat Morales the 2nd time, Morales was already coming off a loss to Zahir Raheem. He went on to loss his next 3 fights:think

 

And why are you making so many Pac threads? Frankly It's sore seeing so many Pac threads and most of them are made by haters. Some serious obsession you got there. I could hardly see a Pac thread made by a fan. Just same persons yapping like a ***** in heat.

 

Bill Butcher,

The PAC vs Morales is a book. There are three chapters. You only read the first chapter. Finish the book and you'll see the bigger picture to complete the story..:good

Cheers!