Why are Pacs losses as good as forgotten but Wlads are always used against him?

Pac's last loss was against a legend and Wlad's, well, was not.

Before that, Pac's last defeat was over 10 years ago - and using them would just be moronic.

But yes, Wlad's defeats were a long time ago, and he's got better since then. More mechanical, less exciting, but better.

 

Pacquiao was stopped because he was too drained. Morales was a great fighter when he beat him.

He isn't likely to be stopped again and he's improved since the Morales loss and is a much better fighter.

As for Wlad, his losses, and even some wins, show his weaknesses and I don't think they've improved. Granted, he's a better boxer, but his chin is still an issue.

That's the difference. Pacquiao no longed has issues, whereas Wlad does.

 

and Klitchko was stopped because he was drunk and so what?

 

Dude.....what is your point here? As if it remotely matters.

 

Id pay money to see what kind of post Farmy posts in this thread.

 

Because heavyweights have always been judged differently than other weight classes. Find a collection of old Ring magazines and you could literally read a century's worth of "the heavyweight division is now the worst it has ever been". In Klitschko's defense he never had to rely on questionable judging for better or worse, not implying that Pacquiao has relied on questionable judges, but Klitschko's wins have thus far always been clear wins and his losses clear losses. Plus people put too much emphasis on losses, to the point that they are misled about a boxer's real ability. So what if Pacquiao or Klitschko have a few losses, they both fought their way up to the top, how can you argue with that?

 

so true people act as if the T in front of KO makes a huge difference in fact a lot of TKOs are worst, Hatton TKO by pac as the 10 count never happened its a nonsense, guys have died from a tko LOL

wlad against sanders was a brutal tkoing

anyway the reason wlad gets critised more is probably due to the chin and clinching issues

 

You'd be surprised.

 

Because pac either lost to a legend or when he was basically a kid!

he dosnt lose to bums like nearly every HW fighter is

 

His early losses came when he was pretty much a skeleton. His most recent loss came to an all time great.

 

atsch

 

:deal

 

NALLEGE will never ever forget Pac's losses to Torrecampo and Singsurat! Never! Those 2 KO losses is what NALLEGE watches again and again to prevent suicide!

 

And me then. atsch