Why are people being so delusional about Ward?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Dec 19, 2011.


  1. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,948
    0
    May 10, 2011
    Ward is top 6 or 7 P4P
     
  2. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    For the same reasons they were delusional about Donaire.

    ESB rules.
     
  3. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    When its all said and done Ward>Calzaghe. It's ok Failey your hate will be ignored.
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    :deal:lol:
     
  5. v2k987

    v2k987 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,257
    1
    Apr 11, 2008
    I don't think anyone but Mayweather fans were claiming all that far fetched crap about him.
     
  6. theword

    theword Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,669
    7
    Aug 3, 2009
    whoa whoa whoa...let's not pretend like Bute has been taking on elite competition here. Hell, based on their resumes I don't think it's unreasonable to put Ward ahead of the other 168ers out there. You're point about Froch losing to Kessler and by the transitive properties is b-level is wrong as well. Froch earned his place in that tourney and fought like a ******* to get to the finals, and then Ward handled him with relative ease.
     
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    :huh, So what, whats that got to do with anything. Top 6-7 rated by who? Just opinions
     
  8. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Naw, Ward isn't over Calzaghe. He could potentially, but he still has to do more
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Funny, we were just talking about you :lol:
    Headbanger was spot on again :good
     
  10. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    I would think most anyone could deduct that a physically prime undefeated World Champion and former gold medalist, who just beat some of the best fighters in the world at his weight, who has Ward's level of ring IQ and skillset, could beat a 46 would be 47 year old man. Ward isn't Pascal (who was clearly vulnerable and not skilled enough to handle Hopkins), and yeah in my opinion him beating Hopkins would be a no brainer, as it stands today.
     
  11. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Froch earnt his place, but hasnt looked convincing.
    Bute had a blip against Andrade, like many felt Ward looked lucky against D Boone.
    Now Ward deserves to be rated #1 now, but against every Bute/Ward common opponent, Bute has looked the better with clearer wins over Bika and Miranda
     
  12. BoxFan53

    BoxFan53 Member Full Member

    409
    0
    Dec 25, 2009
    It is a big step to be assured that Ward would easily defeat Calzaghe, simply because he easily defeated Froch. As Ward said after the fight, any fighter that leaves his face open like Froch did, is going to get hit. Froch did not fight a smart fight, which is imperative against a smart fighter like Ward. Although Calzaghe had an odd style with somewhat slapping punches, he won. He would out smart, outmove, and out fight his opponents. In their prime Calzaghe and Ward would be an interesting matchup, not necessarily exciting, but interesting. I never thought Froch would defeat Ward, and I never saw him defeating Calzaghe, as much as he would like to believe he would.
     
  13. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    He just fought and won, and we Americans need a new boxing hero.

    All of this is totally expected. It'll pass, just give it time.
     
  14. horst

    horst Guest

    What hype???

    He went into the Super Six tournament with the rest of the top guys in his division, and he won it. In dominant fashion.

    That's proof, not hype.
     
  15. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    He does deserve credit but its a bit OTT