Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dedication, Nov 20, 2012.


  1. Dedication

    Dedication Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,104
    0
    Jun 5, 2012
    Broner just moved up a division and beat the top guy with ease.

    It's laughable that all these people here are complaining.

    What has Froch done other than lose to Ward, Dirrell and Kessler?

    Since when do fighters get props for losing?
     
  2. Dedication

    Dedication Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,104
    0
    Jun 5, 2012
    Broner did not lose to Ponce De Leon

    Who of relevance did Froch beat at the age of 23?
     
  3. mick557

    mick557 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,578
    5
    Nov 4, 2008
    Wins over Pascal, Taylor, Dirrel, Abraham, Johnson, Bute **** all over anything Broner has acomplished. No shame in losing to Ward who you can argue is the best fighter in the world at the moment.
     
  4. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
  5. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    Imma beat yo an yo mommas ass
     
  6. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    You seem purely ignorant.
     
  7. Dedication

    Dedication Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,104
    0
    Jun 5, 2012
    Pascal - who had he beaten at that stage

    Taylor - shot fighter, who hadn't done anything significant at 168. Also he still schooled Froch for 11 rounds haha. That's like saying Khan should get credit for beating Judah.

    Dirrell - green fighter... who had he beaten at that stage

    Johnson - old, ancient fighter

    Bute - best win was against someone Carl Froch already murdered

    Abraham - his best win at 168 was over a shot fighter that Carl Froch had already knocked out

    Who else?

    Robin Reid - haha!

    Let's face it, this guy is good but overrated.
     
  8. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    He was still an amateur at 23.:lol:

    Step you game up flower and do a bit of research.

    Your thread is balderdash and I hope it's not an indication of your boxing knowledge.
     
  9. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    I think you sleep in the same bed as your sister.
     
  10. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    I think I sleep in the same bed as your sister.
     
  11. Dedication

    Dedication Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,104
    0
    Jun 5, 2012
    :lol: Nuthuggers taking this all to heart I see
     
  12. Elliot

    Elliot Boxing Addict banned

    5,304
    0
    Jan 22, 2012
    DeMarco was the top guy according to?

    Froch lost to Ward and Kessler, Carl Froch SD12 Andre Dirrell.

    Plenty of fighters get props for losing when they take on top competition, no one at 160-175 would get close to beating Ward at the minute so no shame in that, and the fight with Kessler was a war.

    Pascal- Nobody great, but then again who between losing to Froch and beating Dawson (I'd be very surprised if you didn't have on your P4P list before the Ward fight) did he beat who was worth mentioning?

    Taylor- Beat Jeff Lacy in a WBC eliminator (No big deal I know but still not that bad)

    Dirrell- Think he proved against Froch that he is very tough to beat.

    Johnson- Yusaf Mack and Allen Green in his last three bouts.

    Bute- As much as I think he was protected and felt although Froch would win that bout he was far from favorite and Bute was regarded as #2 in the division.

    Abraham- Was still regarded as a power puncher, made Dirrell visit Dr.Shawhi

    Stop twisting **** to fit your agenda, the most legit thing you could have posted is that a two division champion should be ranked above a one division champion, however to say that you would have to rate Ricky Burns as high as Broner, now if you think they deserve to be rated the same fair enough Broner > Froch, however if you are going to say Broner > Burns the only way you can do that is by saying Broner has fought a higher standard of competition which would therefore make Froch > Broner.
     
  13. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    WTF does this even matter? Didn't know there was a race to the best record at 23. FFS...fanboys and their crying about some fake list like the P4P list...
     
  14. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    W Bute
    W Pascal
    W Abraham
    W Johnson
    W Taylor
    W Magee
    W Mack
    W Dirrell
    L Ward
    L Kessler

    OR

    W DeMarco
    W Litzau
    W Escobedo
    W Perez
    W Rodriguez
    W Ponce de Leon

    You tell me which set of career fights is worthy of higher ranking.
     
  15. Elite

    Elite Guest

    This. Also beating Demarco wasn`t anything special. Not like Demarco was elite or a great fighter.