Why are so many so many people here stupid when nostalgia involved

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Talivar, Jul 30, 2011.


  1. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    In 20 years people will say "Wlad KO1 [insert 2031 belt holder]"
     
  2. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,313
    21,771
    Sep 15, 2009
    Imo prime wlad (04 - present) only loses to big guys who can outgun him or guys who can get on the inside and hook him.

    The great ali couldn't time joe on his way in and that left hook finishes wlad's night.
     
  4. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    exactly thats why guys like lennox,bowe,foreman could win and also smaller guys like tyson and frazier:thumbsup wlad matches up better vs a guy like ali.
     
  5. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    Mike Tyson vs James Tillis/208lbs/31-8(3KO)/L UD10
     
  6. Bubby

    Bubby Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,564
    3
    Sep 14, 2010
    That's what the TS is posting about!:patschStupid comments like this.
    Yea, Frazier got on the inside against Ali only because Ali didn't have the power. How well did Frazier do at geting on the inside against Foreman?
     
  7. Bubby

    Bubby Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,564
    3
    Sep 14, 2010
    And thats Nostalgia. Fans forget all about fights like Tillis, even Doulgas...........
     
  8. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011

    Yes people do take it too far however the highlighted bit could happen. Pacquiao stopped Hatton, Prescott stopped Khan, Donaire - Montiel.
     
  9. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    Oh i agree these things COULD happen, but also Wlad might do what douglas did or Calzaghe may have put on one of his best performances and took RJJ to scorecards ect
     
  10. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011

    You will obviously get different opinions. You'll get people saying RJJ destroys Calzaghe then you'll get people saying calzaghe wins.
    To be fair when people predict these mythical match-ups they usually think of that person in their prime. When you think of prime Tyson you think of the beast who would destroy people in 1 round not Tyson going 12 with some guy nobody's heard of.
     
  11. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    They normally only think of the fighter they backing in their prime tho thats problem i find, example people will mention Tyson KO ppl in 1 round and then mention Wlads Ko losses as proof of why it will happen. So one mans best moments vs another mans worst.
     
  12. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    Yeah thats just plain bias and exageration.
     
  13. Boom1989

    Boom1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,102
    0
    Mar 26, 2011
    How many losses did Puritty have as the knocked Wlad around the ring?
    How did ten people last the distance vs. Sanders and Wlad couldn't?

    Want me to go on? :hey
     
  14. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    it happens. Because after time you do not put the worst fight a guy had as your memory of a great, you remember his best and figure that is the guy you want matched with the recent guys. If we could match past greats with other past greats we might be very surprised at some results.
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,313
    21,771
    Sep 15, 2009
    I know you're not being serious when you compare wlad and foreman stylistically.