Why are the WBC banning someone's father being their chief second

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ZODIUS!!!, Dec 14, 2016.


  1. ZODIUS!!!

    ZODIUS!!! The certified boss banned Full Member

    2,038
    2,037
    Nov 27, 2016
    Why and what gives them that right ?
     
    ZODIUS!!!, Dec 14, 2016
    ZODIUS!!!, Dec 14, 2016
    #1
    Todd498 likes this.
  2. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,374
    6,927
    Feb 5, 2016
    Making an entire rule that effects so many boxers just so you don't have to deal with Eubank Sr. Can't say I disagree.
     
    Reg, Dec 14, 2016
    Reg, Dec 14, 2016
    #2
    Robney, kriszhao and ZODIUS!!! like this.
  3. ZODIUS!!!

    ZODIUS!!! The certified boss banned Full Member

    2,038
    2,037
    Nov 27, 2016
    Ha ha yea I can't stand the Eubanks either

    But what I'm asking here is why and what is their justification ?
     
    ZODIUS!!!, Dec 14, 2016
    ZODIUS!!!, Dec 14, 2016
    #3
    Todd498 and Kevin Willis like this.
  4. Boxing Prospect

    Boxing Prospect Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,249
    5,725
    May 10, 2012
    Apparently the rule is one that won't ACTUALLY make any difference and is more of a headline grabber
     
    Boxing Prospect, Dec 14, 2016
    Boxing Prospect, Dec 14, 2016
    #4
    ZODIUS!!! likes this.
  5. Flamazide

    Flamazide Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,374
    1,927
    Jul 27, 2016
    Do you have a link to this? I haven't found a lot of info on this so far.
     
    Flamazide, Dec 14, 2016
    Flamazide, Dec 14, 2016
    #5
  6. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,171
    27,893
    Jan 18, 2010
    We already have the Ali act. Let's call this the Eubank act.
     
    Robney, Dec 15, 2016
    Robney, Dec 15, 2016
    #6