why are we not producing any solid 140lb & 147lb fighters?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Logan_87, Nov 28, 2012.


  1. Logan_87

    Logan_87 Guest

    in british boxing at the moment, we seem to be producing a lot low and high weight fighters, but not enough light welters and welters. we got the bantamweights, we got the flyweights, we got the super middles, middles, and heavyweights, but not enough welters and light welters. we need a few coming through who can provide a solid test for the likes of broner, rios, matthysse, bradley, etc. we have kell brook and (although not sure about him) amir khan, but we need more.

    why do you think this is?
     
  2. MaceTheDon

    MaceTheDon Member Full Member

    231
    0
    May 27, 2012
    we got a ton of good lightweights, i'm sure some of them could move up to LWW, so I don't necessarily know what the problem is.
     
  3. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    You're unsure about a guy who's won two world title's yet you're good with Brook? :lol: Ok.
     
  4. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Because fighters aren't fighting at that weight because they feel better at lower or higher weights. I wouldn't say there's much reason behind it.

    It's like in school you get a really good year or two at football and the odd poxy one. Then all of a sudden Year 7 the next year is brilliant (new batch of LWW and WW).

    Just happens like that..
     
  5. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    Khans beat Kotelnik, Maidana, Malignaggi and Judah at 140 lbs not a bad list of top fighters for a guy you are not sure about.

    Burns I think wouldn't be undersized at 140 lbs but seems to be making weight at 135 lbs easily enough that he likely won't or doesn't need to move up.

    Brook at 147 lbs if he manages to beat Alexander well be another.
     
  6. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Fair Point :good
     
  7. Smoggy7188

    Smoggy7188 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,910
    0
    Oct 13, 2010
    You mention light welter and welter but not cruiserweights ....
     
  8. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    6
    Jul 21, 2008
    He also mentioned flyweight as one of our stronger divisions...:p
     
  9. jonny

    jonny Member Full Member

    487
    5
    Oct 8, 2009
    The title said solid fighters, we know khan aint solid, we dont know if brook aint solid yet!!
     
  10. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Khan and Brook are respectable fighters at 140 and 147.

    Britain will rarely produce a tonne of talent in each weight class. When we have its partly to do with a weak division and partly to do with the best not being eliminated by the best i.e. Murray, Barker and Macklin at 160.
     
  11. Quinton_Mob

    Quinton_Mob Member Full Member

    452
    0
    Oct 25, 2012
    I would say that feather and super feather are a weakest divisions
     
  12. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    Still criminal not at least one fight has been made yet!

    Too many fighters seem scared to lose to domestic rivals.
     
  13. sniffmybadger

    sniffmybadger Boxing Junkie

    10,147
    10,631
    Jan 20, 2010
    Why am I not producing enough solids? I'm eating plenty of fibre. :think
     
  14. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    It's emabarassing. Quigg Frampton is another. Price Fury is another.
     
  15. Logan_87

    Logan_87 Guest

    yeah but would you rather favour khan in a fight with a big puncher or brook? brook has at least shown his punch resistance is there, whereas khan - well......