LMAO, what does that prove exactly? 1. I have 0 issue with people thinking Hagler beats Canelo, he has a very good chance. It's a fantasy matchup, if I had to bet my house on it, I'd bet 60/40 in Canelo's favour. 2. We're not debating Hagler/Canelo here, we're talking about what Duran, Hearns and SRL accomplished at MW. I say not much, and most elite MWs would beat them, which you seem to heavily dispute without providing any facts, for the simple reason that they're "greats". 3. Galileo believed that the earth revolved around the sun, the rest of the world thought he was crazy. My point is, majority vote on a "fantasy" matchup that can never be proven absolutely proves nothing. It's a logical fallacy appealing to the majority, which is as much a logical fallacy as they come.