Why are Wlad and Vitali Never Manadtories for Each-Other?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jeff Young, Jun 6, 2009.


  1. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    Anybody else wonder this as well?.....You figure they would come up as the other one's mandatories?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,387
    48,762
    Mar 21, 2007
    Wow. What a great, great, great, great question. That one question right there really has exposed the politicing that exsists in the ABC governing bodies. Great thinking.
     
  3. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Because belt organizations are corrupt bodies where the fighters' promoters often control who gets the shot at the belts and who doesn't.... and since the Klits aren't interested in fighting each other the promoters don't bother to put in the good word to the organizations thus they never become each other's mandatories.
     
  4. Larryboys

    Larryboys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,648
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    None of the major alphabet organisations rank the champions of any of the others, so they can't become mandatories. Why, I don't know, but that's what they do.
     
  5. Euxinis

    Euxinis alien Full Member

    462
    0
    Mar 6, 2009
    it's pointless.
    lets say some ABC organization say "Wlad is champ, and Vitaly is a mandatory, so you have to fight."
    then Vitaly says - I don't need this belt, so pass my mandatory status to someone else.
    and that's it. Noone can strip an ABC belt from Wlad because he didn't refuse to fight the mandatory - mandatory refused. then comes next in the line - and Wlad fights.
    game over.
     
  6. Euxinis

    Euxinis alien Full Member

    462
    0
    Mar 6, 2009
    good point too
     
  7. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    makes sense, and thanks for answering the question.
     
  8. Euxinis

    Euxinis alien Full Member

    462
    0
    Mar 6, 2009
    good guestion too ))

    I also didn't think till now about why they don't fight each other from this point of view. so I've just tried to figure it out myself
     
  9. LaidOut

    LaidOut Whaaaaat? Full Member

    2,617
    943
    Mar 2, 2009
    They've both said they wouldn't fight each other cuz they're brothers. Then get the **** out of boxing if that's the case, you big ass puzzies and go hug each other at home.
     
  10. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    i'm not harsh like that, but everybody has there price...if somebody would throw some serious cash out there, make the fight happen.
     
  11. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,642
    9,692
    Jul 15, 2008
    We all know the answer ... corrupt boxing authorities (LOL)
     
  12. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    they are the don kings of europe. they control who holds the belts.
     
  13. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,385
    1
    May 30, 2009
    Fantastic question. We all know they'd never fight so maybe the alphabet organisations know that if they force the fight via mandatory they would lose the belt holding Klitschko and the mammoth sanctioning fees with it. The brothers are big business. You never know what is going on behind the scenes in boxing.