Why Are You Picking PW To Beat Pavlik/Why Are You Picking Pavlik To Beat PW?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, Oct 7, 2009.


  1. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    so you dont think paul can get pavliks respect? with his power/speed/output?

    not that i am trying attack your point (even though i dont exactly agree but it is a sensible point) i'm just looking for you to expand a bit
     
  2. Godfather

    Godfather I put the G in God Full Member

    407
    2
    Jun 10, 2008
    I thinks Paul's greater speed, movement and volume will cause a very late TKO or clear points decision
     
  3. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    hey man, fair enough :good

    i'll first start off w/ this pic to illustrate (literally) my point..

    This content is protected


    that's the best lhw in the world, all 180+lbs of him hammering the **** out of kelly just as he did all night. kelly was at a big size/strength disadvantage in this fight (regardless of all the prefight bs of bhop getting ko'd). he won't be at a size and strength disadvantage against pw. kelly will be there to be hit just as he always was. BUT, if you watch this bhop fight again, bhop would crack the **** out of him and kelly would keep coming forward. HOWEVER, if you watch closely, he does pause/blink even if momentarily and that gave bhop the time he needed to pop out and do it all over again. now, if you watch the miranda fight, again pav was there to be hit...BUT, only this time when he was equal to or had the size advantage, those shots wouldnt make him lose his timing. he would get cracked but it wouldnt throw him off and he could execute his own gameplan.

    everyone who points out that pav relies heavily on timing and getting his opponent in range do have a valid point. but bhop was so big and strong he could prevent pav from executing whereas i don't think pw can hit nearly as hard as bhop...or miranda...or taylor for that matter.

    to answer your question, yes i do believe pw can hit hard enough to get pav's attention. hell even pav admitted that taylor kicked like a mule and i don't think pw hits that hard (not to repeat myself). but that fact doesnt mean that taylor or miranda were able to throw pav's timing off like bhop was.
     
  4. bkamins

    bkamins Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,465
    2
    Sep 29, 2008
    A. Williams is a better Boxer. B. Pavilik hasn't been impressive in quite some time. I thought he got lucky catching Taylor in the first fight and that the second one was a draw. Obviously, the loss to Bernard shows that if experienced fighters go in with a gameplan than can easily best Kelly, who is a very good but basic fighter.
     
  5. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    i personally think bhop was hurting pavlik because of the speed... i dont see bhop as a strong guy....

    his last tko/ko was in 2004 against oscar (someone who had no business at 160)

    and prior to that it was in 2002 against carl daniels (who?) and tito trinidad (another guy with no business at 160).... i wouldnt consider him heavy handed or anyhting.. he's a brilliant fighter

    i think he got pavlik out of his comfort zone after the 3rd or 4th round of the fight and couldnt get into rhythm.... because of that pavlik was out of it from then on...


    either way its irrelevant.... definitely a fair point
     
  6. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
    Its do or die for Kelly

    Im thinking Kelly by KO but im not 100% sure...Paul Williams aint no bum
     
  7. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    Hops is not a finisher anymore. But he does have power, he's slowed down his output and probably doesn't throw all the muster in his punches all the time. Look at Hops arms and shoulders in that pic.Tito was fine at 160, do you remember what he did to Joppy?
     
  8. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    In my opinion the differences between the two fighters are clear. I pointed out a number of things in the thread I started where I ask "What does Wiliams have that Pavlik hasn't seen."

    Paul Williams is not a mystery or enigma. He is a fairly simple pressure fighter. He uses his height and reach advantages to set up in front of opponents who can't reach him, and then overwhelms them with volume. When he's done punching, he moves to his own right. That's what he does; over and over and over.

    His footwork is good, but basic. Put that with his tendency to carry his right down low, and he is a relatively easy target for Pavlik's left hook from outside, and that is probably the most under-rated weapon in KP's arsenal.

    Paul's work rate gets a lot of attention. However, his accuracy is really poor. In addition, everytime we've seen KP go with someone who throws a lot, Kelly throws more. Paul's connect rate in a given round rarely rises above 25%. Pavlik's connect rate rarely drops below 35%. The math on this one is simple; the bigger, stronger, more powerful man is going to hit the smaller man harder and more often than the smaller man hits him.

    Paul's use of angles also gets to much attention. He routinely leaves himself wide open to shots that come right down the pipe. Kelly Pavlik became middleweight champion of the world throwing straight punches.

    So far the build up to this fight looks exactly like the build up to Haglar/Hearns. Tommy could have given Marvin the toughest fight of his career, but he didn't because he was hell bent on knocking Marvin out. Paul is doing the exact same thing.
     
  9. younghov2k4

    younghov2k4 R.I.P. Thunder, Viper Full Member

    1,156
    1
    Jul 23, 2004
    Paul Williams

    i think his jab will be a big standout and i think Pavliks chin will crack before Paul's does.
     
  10. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Paul's jab:patsch

    I can only assume you are being sarcastic.
     
  11. P.4.P.G.O.A.T.

    P.4.P.G.O.A.T. Q Boro Killa Bee Full Member

    3,259
    3
    Oct 10, 2007
    Agreed - Paul's jab is a pawing nothing of a punch. The only thing effective about it is the volume at which it's thrown. Pavlik's got a workrate equal to PW's - let's not forget that, and his jab is a thudding jab that does damage over time. Paul is not hard to find in the ring, and cannot touch the ring smarts or savvy of Bernard Hopkins. I didn't expect him to beat Hopkins. But I expect him to beat Williams. Late rounds TKO.
     
  12. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    After you "Mr. I'm Not Going To Post My Analysis In Public". :patsch
     
  13. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    ask your home boys.... by the end of our pm's they were re thinking the whole fight... im not wasting my time posting **** to people who wont listen
     
  14. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Actually, if I were training Paul, or any other fighter, for a match with Pavlik, I would tell my guy to stay the **** out of anything that looks like a jabbing contest.
     
  15. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Say it in the public forum or STFU! You have NO right to ask or opionions and analysis when you REFUSE to give yours.