Why aren't all talented fighters....

I've been noticing a trend with the EE fighters. The really talented ones with good/amazing amateur experience are now
being fast tracked to world titles. There's quite a lot to name but the main two are Lomachenko and Usyk, then there are the likes of Dereyanchenko, Lipinets, Bivol, Gvozdyk, Beterbiev etc.

My question is why aren't the other major boxing nations doing this? when you have a prospects like Errol Spence, Jo Jo Diaz, Oscar Valdez it's clear they don't need to be fighting opponents with more than 2 or 3 losses after their 12th fight. I personally think this EE way is the best way to bring along a talented prospects because it separates the real talents early rather than wait till the guy is 25-0 and then he loses on his first step up like an Amir imam or Liam smith.

I know there are few exceptions especially in the UK who are starting to catch on with the likes of Joshua, Andrew Selby, Charlie Edwards, Quigley, Josh Taylor and Ohara Davies.

 

Lol fair enough I can understand that arguement, where their is a trend building with the best fighters having a good amateur background isnt maybe time the US and UK catch on to this?

 

The reason I bring this up is because I hate seeing a padded record of 25-0 like a Hugo centeno Jr or kell Brook when there isnt even 3 or 4 solid guys in their resume.

 

I'm not an avid watched of MMA but considering MMA has several fighting disciplines ingrained I would think the old addage styles makes fight would be the main reason for loses. Someone who is more of a wrestler might beat a judo type whereas a judo guy might beat a boxer type and a boxer type might beat the wrestler type etc.

 

I think Lomas team bit off more than they could chew with that one, but Salido didn't exactly win in a non controversial manned I must add even though he won and thats what matters. But like at how Loma took apart a way more professionaly experienced Gary Russell or Usyk did with Glowacki, if they unify or become undisputed in under 20 fights surely that overshadows a Crawford or Golovkin who took 30-40 fights to do it?

 

Im in agreement with you no point having these guys fighting bums at 23-0, it sets em up for failure when they suddenly step up. The US should be doing this with their top talents especially if they have a solid amateur background. Lubin, Davis, Stevenson, Haney, these kind of guys need to be steppes up quicker

 

Nothing to do with styles? I highly doubt styles has nothing to do with it. But anyway the type of fighters am talking about do have good amateur pedigree e.g. Spence, Diaz, etc why does it take Spence 20 fights to fight an Algeri for me he could of beaten Algeri 4 fights ago maybe not as dominantely but he could of beaten him and by now he would have had a belt and be looking at unifications.

 

I think they are stuck in there ways, Davis does have amateur experience maybe not World level like Loma but he went pro early the guy is only 22, Haney went pro at 17 these guys aren't like Usyk, Rigo, Loma who stuck around in to have 300 amateur fights.