Why Broner and Guerrero in the official Ring Mag Libra por Libra top 10 and not Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Changfoo, Mar 4, 2013.


  1. Changfoo

    Changfoo Guest

    I ain't no brittard and i hate british glass jawed frauds but i respect Froch for fighting the best and was the best 168 next to Ward but why is that hood rat ni99a Broner in the top 10 and even Robert Guerrero at 10 and Froch ain't?

    WTF is this bullshyet. Are you telling me Guerrero and Broner did more than Froch? LOL
     
    Changfoo, Mar 4, 2013
    Changfoo, Mar 4, 2013
    #1
  2. Xerant

    Xerant Gotta Hate negociations! Full Member

    4,822
    4
    May 11, 2009
    Because one fighter is old stuck at a weight doing good. The other is young going trough weight class doing good. Simple economics really.
     
    Xerant, Mar 4, 2013
    Xerant, Mar 4, 2013
    #2
  3. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Because this is a dirty game.
     
    MrMagic, Mar 4, 2013
    MrMagic, Mar 4, 2013
    #3
  4. Changfoo

    Changfoo Guest


    I mean come on, Broner maybe, but Guerrero? All that Chicano won was interim WBC ****ing belts and even had the nerve to say he was the first Mexi-American to win multiple belts in diff division and totally ignored Oscar lol
     
    Changfoo, Mar 4, 2013
    Changfoo, Mar 4, 2013
    #4
  5. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Broner maybe, based on what exactly?

    A win over DeMarco?

    Give me a break dude.
     
    MrMagic, Mar 4, 2013
    MrMagic, Mar 4, 2013
    #5
  6. Xerant

    Xerant Gotta Hate negociations! Full Member

    4,822
    4
    May 11, 2009
    Isint guerrero champ in 5 weight class?
     
    Xerant, Mar 4, 2013
    Xerant, Mar 4, 2013
    #6
  7. mgdb26

    mgdb26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,352
    4
    May 11, 2009
    While Froch's resume is obviously WAY better than Broner's, I can see the argument for putting Broner ahead of Froch just based on the physical tools he has and how dominant he has looked in his past few fights, although it's not an argument I would agree with.

    I can't see any good argument that could be made for why Guerrero would be ahead of Froch. Not only does Froch's resume **** all over Guerrero's, his physical tools and skills are superior to Guerrero as well. Other than maybe hand speed, Froch is better than Guerrero in every single category one could come up with.
     
    mgdb26, Mar 4, 2013
    mgdb26, Mar 4, 2013
    #7