Why can fighters fight at older ages today but not in the past?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Feb 23, 2025.


  1. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,489
    3,712
    Apr 20, 2010
    Yes, so many rose-tinted opinions... but then again, on a Classic forum that's to be expected.

    There will always be people in a place like this, who are adamant, that the real old-timers (like from 100 years ago, back in the 1920s) were these gallant warriors, who were battling it out 10-12 (or more!) times a year. And often in long, hard fights - where they only survived thanks to extraordinary heart and bravery, that modern (sissy) fighters can only dream about. Jesus!
     
    OddR and Badbot like this.
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,759
    10,127
    Mar 7, 2012
    There’s just as many poor posters with recency bias and no knowledge of the past.

    We have to pick out the balanced posts from the knowledgeable posters.
     
  3. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,868
    7,424
    Sep 19, 2021
    yeah, he’s got injury issues. He isn’t someone who would be able to go until he’s older. He’s got maybe one fight left in him at a high level. Anything after that he’d be on a downslide, so I don’t think he’d bother.
     
  4. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,489
    3,712
    Apr 20, 2010
    You're right - it of course goes both ways!
     
    Serge and Loudon like this.
  5. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    45,619
    33,653
    Apr 17, 2011
    So they are basically talking about the modern Thai boxers.
     
  6. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    78,833
    128,367
    Jul 21, 2009
    I actually have a lot of respect for the fighters from back in the good old days and just generally people from back then. There were a lot of great characters around back then and I genuinely loved reading about those fighters and characters and the history of the sport.

    Some of the greatest posters and some of my favourite ones posted exclusively or almost exclusively on the Classic but, that being said, I do find that kind of thing you alluded to irritating and generally I would rather debate fights which can actually materialize not hypothetical ones we can never know the outcome of
     
    Bukkake likes this.
  7. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,650
    18,405
    Oct 4, 2016
    Why so many old heavyweights still fighting? because there's not enough good heavyweights to make these old guys quit.
     
  8. OddR

    OddR Active Member Full Member

    1,453
    1,491
    Jan 8, 2025
    You should open a thread talking about if we should include Amateur achievements in greatness discussions. You raise some great points on it agree even though I admittedly probably don't take it as far as you in that regard but I might someday.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2025
    Serge likes this.
  9. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Active Member Full Member

    859
    936
    Mar 3, 2024
    it's quite simple, training methods used to be primitive and the concept of regeneration did not exist. The fighter had to train, fight, train, fight, the injuries were unimportant, they were treated in strange ways, but the body was wearing out.
    Bettberbijev is a good example, 100 years ago, to be in the game, he would probably fight every few months or weeks regardless of injuries, just like Usyk, who also has injuries, but fighting twice a year manages to heal.

    1. Better training
    2. Less intense career
    3. better medical care

    Also remember that today no one would allow something like Dempsey did with Wilard. even the gentleman who judged Mercer's fight with Morrison
     
    Overhand94 likes this.
  10. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,730
    3,275
    Jan 6, 2024
    History shows they could fight at older ages in the past. I think now what we see is the early 40s guy becoming more common. But the first one was Joe Goddard in the 1890s. Late 30s, early 40s has never been a glass ceiling really.

    Another factor is the way boxing is set up today fighters are getting to the belt later and later and all the milestones in their career are getting pushed back including the ending.
     
  11. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,489
    3,712
    Apr 20, 2010
    Some good points here... though I think, there's a tendency to put too much emphasis on the "less intense career" thing!

    Yes, yes I know... for years we have been told, that old-timers often had crazy careers with ridiculous schedules... fighting 10-12 times (or more!) a year. Sure, there were these 100-200+ fight guys, that you don't see anymore. But those types of careers were very rare, and had little to do with what boxing was actually like for your average boxer, back in the "good old days".
     
    Serge likes this.
  12. Manu Vatuvei

    Manu Vatuvei Active Member Full Member

    1,193
    809
    Apr 21, 2011
    Let’s be serious here. It’s because back in the day them dudes were weak-bodied weak-willed cowards. They also used to look 50 when they were 30 and they used to die young. These idiots literally didn’t know how to stay alive and we valorise them. We are straight up better humans now. We should be soaking that up rather than sucking up to the pathetic dweebs of the past.
     
  13. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    78,833
    128,367
    Jul 21, 2009
    Four round, six round, and eight round fights in the pros are still included as part of a pro great's impressive records and greatness even though they're generally against tomato cans, journeymen and low level opponents.

    What's more impressive medalling in a prestigious amateur tournament against the best fighters in the world or an entire region of the world in a 3-4 rounder or beating a full time bricklayer with 35 losses in a 4,6, or 8 rounder who is ranked 850-2000 in the world?

    What's more impressive out of Loma winning 400 + amateur fights and suffering only 1 loss which he avenged twice (to one of the very best fighters at his weight), an absolutely insane level of consistency we have never witnessed from any fighter in history before, winning Olympic gold at two weights, World Amateur gold at two weights, European gold and World Junior gold or winning a world tittle as a pro?

    ''But Audley Harrison won a gold medal doe.'' Well, plenty of duds have won world titles and challenged for world titles as pros and many elite or great amateurs never even turn over and, likewise, many elite and great amateurs have also gone onto become top or great pros

    Three of the top 5 P4P fighters right now were great amateurs or in Bivol's case an excellent one and two of them are top 5 P4P despite being old men.

    Usyk
    Beterbiev
    Bivol

    Had Usyk and Beterbiev even just turned pro just one Olympic cycle earlier they would've achieved so much more in the pros than they already have and one is undisputed at two weights and the other was undisputed at one weight despite both turning pro at almost 27 y/o and 28.5 y/o respectively.

    These clowns think that if Usyk, Beterbiev and Loma turned pro much younger with much more or their prime injury free years dedicated to the professional ranks they wouldn't have been talented enough to achieve way more than they already have which is downright comical and beyond ignorant. They've always been special talents and were incredible fighters when they were much younger than they were when they turned pro and they would've been at the very least as good as they were in later years had they turned pro much younger.

    I'm still waiting for someone to try and make a good argument for Loma not becoming at least a six-weight world champion if not seven or more had he turned pro in his teens with same day weigh ins like many of his peers and former pound for pound stars and greats. They can't because there isn't one

    Haney is a two-weight champion as a pro despite the fact he has literally never beaten anyone close to his size. That would never happen in the amateurs unless he was a SHW where there is no weight restriction and even then he would still only be able to become a one-weight medallist
     
    OddR likes this.
  14. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,431
    9,762
    Jul 28, 2009
    Rather than a simple and concise answer, I would like to faff about with a multi-factorial muddying of the waters, murky with statistics, lies, and damned lies. I would like to talk about nutrition, oleomargarine, concentric circles, corn fields, polyphenol content, forever chemicals, muffin tops, the BET and Lifetime channels, 90 Day Fiance, JRE, mitophagy and autophagy, chauffeuring of autophagy, by Morgan Freeman, the effect of dong length on telomere length, Diddy, plyometrics, etc. If you're not comfortable with that, than I don't even wanna have this conversation.
     
    Loudon, Arch Stanton and Levook like this.
  15. Levook

    Levook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,601
    3,042
    Aug 26, 2020

    I don't really recall ever conversing with you, but I have read many of your comments and I must say that your posts are getting even stranger, if that's possible.

    Very entertaining though! Please keep up the good work.
     
    Boxed Ears likes this.