Why cant Floyd be more like Bhop?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bambalan, Oct 19, 2008.


  1. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    PBF is now only about the the money and theatrics. The in ring challenge is no longer a priority when making match ups. This of coarse is a moot point now that he's retired but it was his career path for the last few years.
     
  2. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    People just finding a way to hate on floyd...last I checked B-hop called floyd the greatest of his era right after the hatton-mayweather fight last year--see the video on youtube...anyways now people are hating on floyd because b-hop won...floyd is retired why are you making a thread about him newbie calm yo lil a$$ down
     
  3. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    I concur.
    But don't go around claiming Floyd would beat Pavlik!!!
     
  4. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    there is NO WAY jones is better than PBF...not in resume not in skill...bhop at least has an argument

    1 mayweather
    2 bhop
    3 Joe C when he beats jones

    jones got ktfo by tarver then was afraid to engage with him in the 3rd fight and got ktfo by glen johnson...he beat a terrible heavyweight who had no chance ...tito WAY past his prime with a gut...he had great talent it is a shame he would never risk a tough fight til he had to
     
  5. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    I am dead serious...i like pavlik...but at 160 how does he catch floyd...floyd is 155 why wouldnt he be able to beat him??? give me a reason...i dony think PBF could beat hopkins...but pavlik
     
  6. COLD-HARD-TRUTH

    COLD-HARD-TRUTH Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    8
    Sep 21, 2008
    I agree with everything you said...excpet that you called Hatton a bum....too small for Floyd yes, but a bum no. :good
     
  7. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    I am threadin this with a poll...I want to see what others may think
     
  8. adub215

    adub215 Active Member Full Member

    1,044
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    agreed thats why i say floyd was extremly great under 140 but once he came jr ww he was just blah
     
  9. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,105
    2,738
    Jul 20, 2004
    Retirement is an option in boxing, whenever you feel that you lost the desire you're better off out of the sport or dead in the ring. Hopkins still having the motivation doesn't make him better than Mayweather, it just makes him different in his own way.

    Mayweather has accomplished enough already and has the right to retire if he wanted to. Staying in the sport when he doesn't have motivation to satisfy haters who want to see him get KO'd and discredit every win he scores is a waste of time.
     
  10. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Cool! :good
     
  11. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007

    no boxer deserves to be called a bum..but why is hatton too small for floyd...he walks around at 180...he just got outclassed not outmuscled...malignaggi will outclass him too
     
  12. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Too much BS being posted here.
     
  13. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    because floyd has made more money in his career than b-hop has....


    floyd is more secure and doesnt need the money as much as bhop does
     
  14. COLD-HARD-TRUTH

    COLD-HARD-TRUTH Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    8
    Sep 21, 2008
    Don't insult RJJ and the sport of boxing by saying Gayweather is better than Roy. You f'n ****** ass fanboy *****. At least Jones had the balls to fight Tarver after winning the Heavyweight title...who was the number one guy at 175 at the time! You're ***** ass idol retired instead of giving the fans who made his punk ass rich, the fights they want to see. Floyd would have some losses too if he actually had the balls to fight the best guys out there...ya know..what real champions like Hopkins and Mosely have consistantly done throughout their careers. I don't like to start with the name calling but I'll make an exception for a ****ing moron like you. Oh, by the way, Roy didn't really lose (except for disqualification) until he was what? 35? Floyd is retired at 31 and too f'n scared to fight any of the top welters. I tell you what, when Floyd comes out of retirement and starts beating guys like Margarito and Cotto, than you can start running your mouth but until that time, shut the **** up about Floyd being better than RJJ.
     
  15. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,723
    27,036
    Jul 26, 2004
    i realise that... and respect his retirement. the thing is as a fan, when rating him against others... i have the right to say, well fighter A retired when his toughest challenges awaited him within his weight class, fighter B, though 43 years old.. lol... is still going after undefeated champions.