Why can't you admit that the Klitschko brothers would give Ali huge problems?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slothrop, Mar 17, 2009.


  1. Kaki

    Kaki Guest

    Athletic my ass man. Holmes was athletic. Holyfield was athletic.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s1PIHQmMWo
     
  2. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    I could be wrong, but I believe that constitutes what is known as an "ass kicking."
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    comon man double uppercut to the body and head followed by a step back and a pinpoint 1-2

    Even Roy Jones was impressed with that KO combo


    Say what you will about Danny Williams but the man has HEART
     
  4. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    shut up man..NEWBIE U DONT KNOW NOTHIN BOUT BOXING..U JUSS A LIL KID BANGIN OVER THE NET...
     
  5. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    It's not good enough. His fans are annoying.
     
  6. Kaki

    Kaki Guest

    Nah, I think Roy Jones Jr. was less than impressed when he saw that finish. Compare the two KOs:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUvrSbAKq9M&feature=related
     
  7. Carnage

    Carnage KingFroch Full Member

    2,502
    0
    Jan 9, 2009
    I could be wrong but Danny Williams ain't no Frazier, Liston or Foreman.
     
  8. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    I could be wrong, but nobody was claiming he was.
     
  9. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    I'd say VITLAY was behind in both the fights he lost, once he quit in one and paid the doctor to quit for him in the other.

    He was also behind in the Hide fight and also in the Sanders fight after sprinting across the ring like Usain Bolt when Sanders had the nerve to hit him in round 1.

    WALDO does NOT have one of the best offensive arsenals, what a load of bull****. It's really easy to look great when fighting guys that don't hit back....he's a white Frank Bruno.
     
  10. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    The score cards say otherwise.



    Goddamn if that's not an objective statement.

    Doubtful. But the results speak for themselves.

    Wlad has one of the best jabs and right crosses of all time. He can also hook off the jab extremely well, which is pretty rare.

    (I don't like his fans much either.)
     
  11. rabid dog

    rabid dog Active Member Full Member

    522
    0
    Jan 21, 2009
    I think it would be no easy time for Ali
     
  12. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    1. The score cards don't say otherwise, they say he LOST.

    2. Yes, I wish I was as objective as you, pointing out how great fighters are when they've never fought anyone :rofl

    3. See point 2.

    4. He hooks off the jab well when there's no danger involved. That's hardly a criteria for 'best offense ever' though, is it? The man doesn't posess an uppercut, for ****s sake. He looks good offensively because he's fighting substandard opposition.
     
  13. Capitan

    Capitan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,938
    55
    Jul 28, 2008

    Klitschko's love to punch once then hold...Ali would have made mince meat out of those two Bozos.

    He would exploit their weaknesses......both would eat jabs and sucker right hands all night.

    How can you compare those two with Ali...they're fighting the calibre of oponents that is even enticing Tyson to make a comeback.

    Not even close!!!
     
  14. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    1. Vitali was winning both fights ON THE CARDS when they ended. Objective fact. Sorry. You lose.

    2. I'm not claiming the Klits are great. Just that they'd give Ali problems.

    3. Point #2 is bull****. Sorry.

    4. We'll have to agree to disagree.