Why Catch Weights are Good for Boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JohnAnthony, Apr 10, 2013.


  1. xRedx

    xRedx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,322
    10
    Dec 17, 2012
    updated my post, forget about margarito I don't think that was one of the victories that makes him an ATG. I look at it as a victory that just keeps Manny active.
     
  2. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    If there's a title on the line, then there should be no catchweight. If you want to call yourself the champ of a division limited at a certain weight (say 154), why would you insist on fighting for that title at a lower weight? Answer: because you aren't the best at that weight limit and feel you would be beaten if the opponent came in at the actual limit. In other words, you want to be the champ of a division you're too small for without fighting anyone at that division's limit.

    It's bull****, though catchweights are great if there's no title on the line.
     
  3. VBOX

    VBOX JOURNEYMAN Full Member

    5,733
    3,881
    Feb 8, 2012
    I really don't care about catchweights. Two fighters agree to a certain weight then give 'er down. It's not like the weight divisions in boxing aren't some arbitrary number anyway, I mean did they do studies that say body types should weigh 154, 160 etc etc.
     
  4. xRedx

    xRedx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,322
    10
    Dec 17, 2012
    haha true the weight class limits are arbitrary numbers. Why is the welterweight limit 147? They just randomly chose it!
     
  5. Chex31

    Chex31 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    15
    Jul 4, 2008
    :deal

    **** that bull****
     
  6. icarus1

    icarus1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,574
    47
    Nov 27, 2010
    I think catch wieghts are acceptable today because of no same day weigh-in fights. Many fighters are able to manage their wieghts well to fight at different divisions.