Why come AJ is not more like his fellow Countrymen Lennox Lewis, who fought EVERYONE!!!

Povetkin and Wlad are most certainly better than the challengers.

But Khan has a better resume than Brook, and we all know who has been ducking that fight.

 

Iam abit lost now lol, i kind of agree tho. Brook is no less of talent tho, the stars alinged for kahn, for brook bad look and poor promotion left a careerer that should of given more.
I was only making a point that joshuas resume/cv (cv iam in the uk afterall) is being compared wrongly alot, as it hasnt been analysed correctly prior to being compared to atgs and hof'ers like in this thread.
Joshua is fighting in a transitional era, where theres very few current fighters who have earned the right to challenge for the belts or have the fan base/ appeal for the fights to make sense financially, and in most cases lack genuine quality.
So to me wlad, pov and pulev make more sense in everyway than fighting say...well anyone apart from wilder...but for example big baby.
How many keep busy fights has joshua had? One in my opinion takam and that was at short notice and should of been a pulev mando.
Sorry for the rant like, i just genuinly interested in peoples oppinion. Respect

 

Dont you think that more lucrative fights on joshuas resume were also better resume wise?

Lets forget wilder for a min and who else could he of faught, instead of povetkin that would of enhanced his cv?

Out of interest, Who would you say is the better scalp cv wise, parker or povetkin?

I think povetkin by a long way, and parker was a belt holder and it was a unification fight aswell. Respect