Why Cotto really lost...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by soxfan57, Jul 27, 2008.


  1. soxfan57

    soxfan57 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,597
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Some of you guys are out of your mind...

    -Cotto didn't lose because his strategy was bad; rather, it was the perfect strategy coming into the fight(imo, in hindsight it isn't tho)
    -Cotto didn't lose b/c he didn't punch to the body (margarito wouldn't let him punch to the body)
    -Cotto didn't lose because he wasn't strong enough or prepared enough physically for this fight (I honestly think this is the best Miguel Cotto has ever looked and I'm a huge Cotto fan)

    No, Miguel Cotto lost because of 2 reasons. 1. He could not hurt Antonio Margarito. 2. Antonio Margarito was relentless. He wouldn't give Cotto a break for 10 seconds!!! It was unbelievable; A top notch Miguel Cotto couldn't break Margarito; in fact, he couldn't even come close despite a valiant effort. So, who could?
     
  2. startown81

    startown81 Active Member Full Member

    653
    0
    Jul 9, 2007
    dont think anyone at welterweight can hurt margo. but you can outbox margo just like williams did.
     
  3. aj415

    aj415 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    6
    Aug 15, 2006
    Brilliant, Holmes.
     
  4. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    If margarito fights like he did yesterday
    then i dont think any current welterweight boxer can do much damage or even win, maybe only Paul the punisher williams, but i dont think he can beat the Margarito of yesterday,

    definately the only way you can win against Margarito is on Pts, and mayweather may be the only man coz of his chicken style and pop shot and tremendous defense.
     
  5. Rock

    Rock Member Full Member

    414
    1
    Jun 7, 2008
    "Chicken Style" I hope you are in the ring winning world titles. Tell your name and when you will be defending your title. We all would love to tune in:D