Why couldn't a one dimensional fighter be the best fighter in the world?

don't let amsterdam twist your mind with his bull**** of one dimentional...
Pacquiao number 1 P4P!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Exactly Pacman isn't one dimensional, a one dimensional fighter is someone like Ricky Hatton who can only fight on the inside.

 

of course he aint one-dimentional..

and sometime being great at one thing, is better to be average-good at multiple thing!

 

The best fighter has more than great offense. There are many more aspects to the game than that. Pac has not alot to fall back on, if someone negates that, and therefore he can't be the best.

 

Marquez didn't find him unpredictable. When Pac faces another good counter pucnher with good timing, he'll lose or get another gift decision.

 

Being 1-dimensional is often considered to be a bad word, it's not. It's better to be great at a few things, than being half-arsed at a wide array of things. However, it's better to be very good at alot of things, so you can mix it up, if someone figures you out.

 

Witter has decent timing In his counter punching there are many.

Prime Hamed would spark Pacquiao.

I bet you will cry when Manny falls down from a rib crushing Hatton shot.

 

Because you can't beat everyone just by having great offense. Look at Vasquez and Rafael Marquez.

Because having great offense only will mean you will be receptible to being hit more often. And if someone have greater power than you, you will likely be KO'ed sooner or later. If someone negates your offense, then you are in deep trouble.

 

atsch atsch atsch you really believe this crap?