Why did anyone give Arthur the 3rd rd.?

Wtf!

 

I've told you I have no interest in analyzing rounds especially in a fight that didn't do a whole lot for me.

You called me out I gave you facts that none of the 3 judges scored the round and plenty of members also scored the round for Beterbiev hence your opinion the round was clear for Bivol was false.

You can do slow motion and analyse the round as much as you want isn't going to change the fact Beterbiev won a decision.

 

Now I understand, you just don't know know the rules of boxing, I'll explain: this is not king of the hill where holding the middle is hurting your opponent, this name of the game is how many concussions can you give your opponent, punch is a direct hit + head violently moves back? That's a score, your opponent nullified your attempts to concusse him and he hit you with 2-3 traumatizing shots? You lost

It's totally understandable you had Arthur winning this fight, you weren't watching a boxing fight, maybe you thought this sport is subjective or something?

What do I care if you sit in the middle while I blow your head off? There's clear criteria by which you judge who wins a round, your feelings about any other criteria than powerful punches that make your head bounce and your brain shake back and forth is irrelevant.

 

Beterbiev walked through Bivol.

 

I think I've been very mature I'm not the one making a whole thread about a single round then calling out members in an attempt to expose them because you have a minority opinion.

None of the 3 judges agree with you plenty of fans don't agree with you so complaining coping and rewatching rounds isn't going to change the official decision.

 

Because judges have never been wrong before......

 

Honestly rewatched the fight it can see a draw or 7-5 Bivol I can't see it for Beterbiev. 4th is the round that I think determines if it should have been a draw or for Bivol close round that I personally thought Bivol won but I can see an argument for Beterbiev. 1-3 were clear Bivol rounds as were 7,8,9. 5,6,10,11,12 Were Beterbiev rounds

 

Judges don't rewatch rounds 3 times in a row and there lies the problem with this whole exercise.

Yeah people could maybe score rounds different rewatching and analysing rounds over and over but that's not how official scoring works. Are we gonna do that for every debatable round that Bivol may of won aswell ?

Seems like this discussion is a bit one sided and I think it's a bit extreme to call out every member for scoring a single round different because a certain member don't agree with it.

 

When all 3 judges score a round for one person that did not deserve to win that round then yes that becomes a problem since it influences how the fight is scored. If all 3 judges did their jobs properly and gave that round to Bivol it would have been a majority draw btw which is a much more fair outcome imo

 

And there's rounds you could possibly analyse that Bivol may of won that he technically didn't deserve according to your criteria so no that's not how it works.