In your opinion not mine and why aren't there threads like this for all the debatable rounds Bivol may not of deserved ? As I said one sided conversation not interested especially after being called out when I had Bivol had 6-3 ahead after 9 rounds.
2 judges had it very close maybe they scored some rounds wrong in favour of Bivol aswell ? All I keep seeing is one sided views in regards to Bivol. Someone else started another thread he had Bivol winning 2 out of the 3 last rounds is that good scorecard ? No one called him out for it. But here I am getting called out being accused of being biased, emotional, because someone went back and "analysed" a round it's nonsense. Shall we do that for every round for Bivol aswell ? Or is it only Beterbiev that gets the special treatment of "analysing" rounds. If I wanted to go back and watch a fight I would I don't need to justify my scoring to anyone my scorecard was completely reasonable and in line with the majority and the 2 of the 3 judges.
If you look at the scorecards they gave Bivol every round he def won 1,2,8,9 which isn't controversial and most of the close rounds they gave to Beterbiev which is where the controversy comes from you can't look at the judges scorecard and point to a round they gave to Bivol that he didn't deserve so I don't see why it's wrong to look if the judges were right or wrong in their scoring
Same thing happened in the Canelo fight btw where all 3 judges gave Canelo the first 4 rounds even though he it should have been 2-2 or even 3-1 Bivol
then you understand that your level of fight scoring is absolutely useless in any way determining what actually happened in a fight. like everyone else, you are entitled to have your opinion heard, and like everyone else, it is subject to be discarded as trash. if in fact it is trash.
No my scoring is how its done officially watching a fight in real time one and done. Your version of "scoring" is just mental gymnastics to make conversation that in the reality means nothing because no judge watches a fight multiple times or "analyses" rounds. Your opinion is not a fact i'm sorry to tell you and don't call me out again because I don't have to justify diddly squat to you. I'm done with this conversation goodbye.
The official punch stats released say Artur landed 13 and Bivol landed 12 in round 3. Whether they can be trusted or not I don't know but they have Beterbiev landing more in 6 rounds 1 round even Bivol 5.
artur didnt land half that in rd 3. 12 for bivol sounds close to accurate. i cant verify at the moment as it seems full footage of these rds is being scrubbed from the internet.
Yeah a grown up who makes a whole thread about a single round coping and then call outs every member because apparently you're the higher authority on how to score fights and we're all mere mortals. Yeah real mature whatever makes you sleep better at night I guess sitting on that high horse thinking your opinion speaks for every boxing fan.
not me, sport. its the video that is the authority. you arent arguing against me, youre arguing against the video. and losing. thats where maturity comes in.
Brother you're stating your opinion as a fact you've called me out and accused me of being biased and etc even though I had Bivol 6-3 up at one point so what's the point of the thread tell me ? You've already made your mind up there's no discussion to be had it's a one sided conversation as I said earlier. Your argument is "you've analysed a round so that means it's irrefutable" and we're all not worthy because it's your opinion and we're all wrong. It's pretty much just like an ambush thread for you to say "yeah I'm right and you're all wrong" So where's the back and forth conversation to be had ? There isn't one it's just a one sided convo.