Why did Cintron deserve a rematch with Margarito, but the Hatton Mayweather rematch i

Fraud is rematching Hatton simply as a way of ducking the AM-Cotto winner.

AM did not rematch Cintron in order to duck anyone. :deal

 

OK, whatever, for sho'... Let's revisit that statement then, which was: Mosley, Quintana and Judah wins (together) beat Mayweather's cherry picking. Two points:

(1) Assuming that what you refer to as cherry picking is Mayweather's entire resume as a WW, then we can eliminate Judah from your list of Cotto's "better" wins given that PBF beat Judah as well. That leaves you with the statement: "Mosley and Quintana" are better wins. Better than any two wins picked from the Baldomir/DLH/Hatton fights?

(2) Assuming that what you refer to as cherry picking is not Mayweather's entire resume but an unspecified selection of fights (not many left besides Shamba Mitchell, right?) then it's only fair to repeat the exercise with Cotto. Here's the statement: PBF wins over DLH, Hatton and Baldomir are better than any of Cotto's cherry picking (say: Alfonso Gomez, Oktay Urkal and the upcoming Margo fight)

You're all over the timeline. How past his prime DLH was when he fought PBF can't be assessed based on Forbes (duh).

"Not being able to fight" is a gross exaggeration.

Mosley being able to outperform DLH in the championship rounds could as well be explained by a strategy to start slowly and preserve himself through some of the middle rounds.

To answer your question, did you see anything in the Mayorga fight that would make you think that DLH is much more past his prime than Mosley is from is own? I'm asking because Mayorga is the only opponent DLH fought between his 2004 loss to Hopkins and the 2007 fight against Mayweather.

 

Besides "duck", is there any word, notion, let alone concept you might happen to know? Because this is totally ridiculous.

 

It aint my fault he's a coward and a ducker.

 

You're too funny.

 

1. Hatton sucks.
2. Margarito-Cintron was very exciting while PBF-Hatton was not.
3. We all knew the outcome of PBF-Hatton 1 and of course the outcome of PBF-Hatton 2.
4. Look a the compubox number for Margarito-Cintron 2. They were amazing. PBF-Hatton 2 wont be.
5. Hatton really really sucks. He is the most overrated fighter within this era.

 

You're actually funnier than Ramshall1.

 

Because Cintron won a championship and Marg lost one. Cintron wanted to prove first fight was a fluke and Marg needed to save his carreer. Very good reason.

Hatton was beat and the person that beat him is still #1 P4P and #1 ranked welterweight, the lineal champ, etc. etc..

See the difference?

 

You'll reply to insult back....but NOT to say how it's a double standard. :roll: Typical...

BTW..I was insulting Jthe idiot oy Boyz...not you specifically. But hey, if YOU think you're one of them...good for you to admit it!

 

How is it a double standard. You obviously have no idea what a double standard is. And you are also too sputid to realise different boxers are held to differnent standards based on what they've already accomplished.

You're an idiot who will post anything, especially if it's irrelevent to the topic. Go back to school stupid. Learn definitions and how to comprehend simple english. I;ll tutor you if your ignorant ass needs it. Free of charge.

 

Someone's not reading the thread, guess who?

 

Damn, looks like I stepped into a war zone with all this name calling. atsch


:fight:bolt

 

Fraud is rematching Hatton simply as a way of ducking the AM-Cotto winner.

AM did not rematch Cintron in order to duck anyone.

:deal this is the bottom line.

 

Did I hear an echo in here?

 

did I hear an empty retort?