Does it take some skills test to be a f0mo? Ignore all relevant facts and timelines at all cost? In worst case, make **** up however you need to make pieces fit?
This is what is known as a non-response and deflection in an informed debate. You brought up Margarito, even though the man was serving a 1 year suspension for loading his gloves. Talk about "ignoring relevant facts." You're a buffoon of the highest order. :rofl You also brought up Oscar, he was beaten up at the end of 2008 and retired. Everything I said was 100% accurate. Question: How do you fight a boxer who is serving a suspension for loading his gloves? Question: How do you fight a boxer who is in retirement?
Seriously moronic, could you be more? cslb, said Floyd fought a 135lber simply because he called him out. If that were true, why did he not fight margarito when he was calling him out before he was suspended, remember that **** didn't happen yet. And christ almighty it's obvious you cannot follow a discussion because you're knee jerking over a point you think you can win. It was quoted that Floyd retired to avoid Oscar's rematch clause, dumbass. Someone said it was because he didn't get the money he wanted, but exactly how much money did he make retired for the length of the rematch clause? Duh makes total sense, make zero dollars just because you would have made slightly less fighting. Awesome.
Just because you obviously talk so much nonsense you can't even keep track of it yourself. Here are your words, again. Again: How was he going to fight Margarito, who was suspended for a year for loading his gloves? How does he fight Oscar, who had retired after being beat up at the end of 2008? Yes, in your hurry to bash Mayweather at any costs, you look like a buffoon. The guys you named were a non-factor when he returned to boxing to fight JMM.