Why did Joe Calzaghe Waste His Prime Years Feasting on Weak Opposition?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Thread Stealer, Jan 25, 2008.


  1. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Actually RJJ did say he had a belt to protect, or something along those lines...

    Either way, he hardly seemed delighted at the risk/reward ratio on offer
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,076
    3,667
    Jun 30, 2005
    How many elite fighters at 168 were American?
     
  3. What's your point? Joe's better than both.
     
  4. SevenSamurai

    SevenSamurai 3 year ESB vet. Full Member

    1,735
    1
    Aug 18, 2005
    Roy Jones in his prime decisions Joe Calzaghe in his prime from SM up to LHW. This fight could have been made by joe if he had have had the ambition, as Roy was looking at a fight against Eubank before he was beaten by Collins. So clearly a british challenge was on his radar then. He even talked about Nigel Benn.

    James Toney in his middle career would be a favourite against Joe at SMW, however Calzaghe was to green then coming off Eubank to take a fight like that. After that of course Toney's career went into a long decline until he fought Jirov, and beat him convincingly.
     
  5. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    When Hatton had the P4P number 1 (PBF) a weight above, he moved up in weight, fought in the states a few times and got the fight. Yes he lost but that was the right way to go about it. Calzaghe had Jones at LHW but just stayed at home defending his WBO "world title" against hand picked opponents. Calzaghe didn't make an effort to fight Jones.
     
  6. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Not this again.:roll:
     
  7. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    All the Joe threads are funny, it's obvious he is feared

    I suppose its a step up from the days he got virtually no mention at all, now he is the most talked about man in world boxing
     
  8. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,076
    3,667
    Jun 30, 2005
    No he's not.

    for one, the mainstream probably talks more about mike tyson who ain't fight since 05'. or de la hoya.

    among fans on this board, mayweather is still the most discussed boxer.

    people still start threads about his alleged ducking of margarito on what seems like an every other day basis.
     
  9. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    It's a toss up between Mayweather and Joe

    Both equally great fighters, hence the extreme bitterness towards them
     
  10. Jones cherry picked many of his opponents hence why he never fought many of the UK's finest over the years and when he came up against a flat footed but relatively quick lanky southpaw he got his ass handed to him.

    Also there is no precedent that says Joe should have been the one to cross the pond when Jones could have done the same while how many times must the reminder of Hopkins little sprinting session be brought up?
     
  11. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    Don't even mention Calzaghe in the same sentance as Mayweather. They are clearly not equally great fighters.
     
  12. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Well if you must do that then we should also bring up the running session Calzaghe had with David Starie.:good
     
  13. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Joe isn't that much better :?
     
  14. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    And it goes on.....
     
  15. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Don't talk to me until your public apology