Why did Joe Frazier not fight Sonny Liston?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Nigel_Benn, Jun 13, 2010.


  1. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,475
    Jan 6, 2007
    Young Frazier vs Old Liston.....see Frazier - Foreman,
    Liston by TKO in 6, when Frazier's Mgmt stops it.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well, in 1969 he proved that he was finished at the highest level by gassing and getting KTFO.

    But before that, he proved he was still a puncher by KOing guys and he proved he could still thrash a ranked man with the one-sided drubbing of Clark.

    Liston suffers because Ring purged him from the rankings. Boxing Illustrated, who continued to rate him like any other diposed champion, had him in its top five in '68.
     
  3. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    Yes, so how could he even show, prove to us that he could do anything against Frazier? We just assume?
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well I don't think anyone in this thread has assumed Liston would beat Frazier?

    But in a way, yeah, we just assume. When a 22-0 prospect steps up and fights a champion we make assumptions based upon how the two fighters appear on film? Why should this be any different? Aside from the fact that we know he beat every single fighter he faced aside from Ali between turning proffesional and 1968.
     
  5. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    And the issue I have is who did he beat after losing to Ali the second time ? It seems more then a few posters here think he has a very good chance against Frazier.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    Nobody, really. McMurray was decent and Clark was pretty good.

    But there is no question of him avoiding the top men. He sought them out, but he was a problem that none of them needed...but I can see why, given his total domination of a young, big, ranked fighter in 1968, Liston would be seen as having a good chance with a genuinely excellent fighter overwhom he has a huge stylistic advantage.
     
  7. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    And Frazier had a massive advantage in youth, could slip and counter the best tool Liston still had available (his jab) and had limitless stamina, Liston having poor stamina one year after 68', the year he's being said to still be a big threat to Joe.

    Personally I think Frazier takes him into deep waters and drowns him around 68', maybe that's just me though.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    Frazier would just have to beat him like a dog. He was probably an 8 round fighter even in '68 if he wasn't controlling the rhythym (which he was good at, in fairness), so he would just do what came naturally and make him work, work, work.
     
  9. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,223
    27,729
    Jan 3, 2007
    Liston had basically been black balled from the championship seen... Most of those fights that we can look at on boxrec, were so low profile that even the most expert fan of the time probably missed a few of them.... Frazier's team may have avoided him, out of shear fear that Sonny could made Joe look less impressive than he did against Bonavena, but frankly, I think that an old Sonny would have lost..
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    Ring reported Liston's matches only grudgingly, but BI was on the money. They kept a close eye on him.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Frazier's own people said they did not want this match. Liston, even in old age in the 60's was deemed too dangerous.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    The question is not what Liston proved post Ali.

    As Joe Frazier's manager you would be responsibvle for furthering the interests of your fighter as best you could.

    You would have to assume that Liston was still nearly as dangerous as ever untill he lost to Martin. If you took the fight on the assumption that Liston was shot and miscalculated, then it could put your plans back two years and possibly get you sacked.

    In short, you would not take this match unless it was a final eliminator for a title fight.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007

    Yes, I know that, I explained it on page one.
     
  14. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    That makes sense, and I agree with it completely.

    I'm just speaking on a hypothetical match between the two very late in Liston's career.
     
  15. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    Liston was surely aging by post '65, but he still fought some tuff cookie's with moderate skills and ability.... Dude's like "Amos Lincoln, Bill McMurray, Henry Clark & Scrap Iron Johnson" were not total pugs or pussies...... I think them were some good wins for Liston......

    Note:

    Liston was doing a job on Leo Martin on ABC TV in '69 until he ate that Whopper burger right-cross from Martin in the 9th round......
    :deal

    MR.BILL