Why did Marquez struggle against Barrera and Bradley?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Aug 5, 2017.


  1. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    Saying he was at his absolute best then doesn't contradict what I'm saying. He wasn't close to shot.

    I think you'd be hard-pressed to give Pacquiao the 3rd fight IMO. H2H vs. resume is always an interesting debate, I don't think it's wrong to say either is the better fighter. The resume gap isn't so huge that it trumps the head to head significance.
     
  2. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,481
    36,136
    Oct 12, 2010
    I had the 3rd fight a draw myself. At the time people were expecting a blow out by Pac because of his "improvements" but as it turned out JMM was simply a stylistic foil for Pac and performed a lot better than people thought.
    Marquez has a stylistic advantage over Pac but based on accomplishments Pac has the edge. Marquez is an ATG, just a notch below Pac. But I'll go out on a limb and say that Pac is a better h2h fighter as well. Not sure if Marquez would have been able to deal with Morales or Cotto.
     
  3. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,982
    31,576
    Feb 25, 2015
    Pax beat Barrera so viciously in 2003 that Merchant asked Barrera " will you retire". Nobody is prime 4 years after an ass whooping like that at 33 with 3 wars with Morales too.

    What's next? Hagler was prime against Leonard at 32 after two savage wars with Hearn and Mugabi.
     
  4. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    I think a draw is generous myself. I think the first two fights can be split by one or two points, but I think JMM handily won the 3rd and definitely won the 4th. Head to Head, when the two fought, I thought JMM was increasingly a step ahead until he sealed the rivalry. So how much someone takes into account their separate resumes outside of each others' fights is subjective. This isn't Ali-Norton for example.
     
  5. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    Merchant asked him a question, therefore Barrera didn't go onto a solid win streak after that proved he wasn't close to shot?
     
  6. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,982
    31,576
    Feb 25, 2015
    Hee barely got by Juarez in the first fight. A fighter who before the Pac beatdown would have schooled with ease.

    Saying Barrera was close to his peak against JMM is like saying Hagler was fresh against Leonard. A fighter in their mid 30s with multiple knockdown drag out wars has seen better days.
     
  7. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    30,387
    16,551
    Dec 6, 2008
    The answer is that Pac was a far better fighter, but head to head, JMM matched up great with him.

    JMM wasn't at his best vs Bradley, but Barrera was close to shot vs JMM so it evens up.
    I recall many Pac detractors say Barrera was past prime vs Pac, the same ones will ignore that JMM vs Barrera was well after that.
     
  8. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    But he beat him handily in the rematch. You can't use a hypothetical to back your argument.

    Hagler against Leonard is very different to Barrera against JMM.

    You people do not know what "shot" means.
     
  9. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,982
    31,576
    Feb 25, 2015
    Hagler Leonard is very comparable to Barrera JMM. You had two war torn aging fighters past their best.