Why did Pacquiao lose to Morales?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, Apr 15, 2010.


  1. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
  2. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Outboxed by a badass.
     
  3. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Because he didn't have his Clito-Ris.
     
  4. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Because Morales fought a great fight and Pac was very flawed technically at that point.
     
  5. slim

    slim Active Member Full Member

    728
    0
    Sep 23, 2006
    morales put in his last great fight he would have beaten a lot of top fighters that night.
     
  6. PopeJackson

    PopeJackson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,615
    3
    Dec 8, 2007
    Because Morales was more of a man than he was.
     
  7. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Morales was better on the night...simple as that.

    Prime for prime these guys would put on a great bout everytime, and be fairly even no matter how many times they fought!
     
  8. ringsider

    ringsider Active Member Full Member

    1,454
    5
    Mar 11, 2009
    Morales is just a better fighter than Pacquiao. If Morales was a few years younger he would still be champ.....he just got old. Prime on prime he would hand Pacquiao his ass 9 out 10 times.:good
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Morales was superior. Flat out. The version of Morales Pacquiao did eventually beat was CLEARLY a spent force. Pacquiao never would have beaten a prime and ready Morales under any circumstances, IMCV.
     
  10. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    Wrong socks, bad oysters, spies in mannys camp etc. Morales was just better that night and even gave Pac a chance to knock him out in the 12th.
     
  11. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :rofl
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    :-( Yet another ****ing dire thread! You're on quite a tear recently.



    Tomorrow I'm going to try and match the sheer inane and immature dogshittery of this by making:



    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected




    Oh wait, I actually won't make that thread because it's puerile and shite, and I'm not "Big Reg".
     
  13. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Morales was a more skilled fighter than Manny at the time... he was also bigger at the time and managed to back Pacquiao up and bully him around with ease.
     
  14. horst

    horst Guest

    Absolute peak Morales would be ****ing bulldozed early by absolute peak Pacquiao, because Morales's absolute peak was at 122-126lbs, and Pacquiao's absolute peak is somewhere between 135 and 147lbs, so your strong conviction on this issue is actually worthless.
     
  15. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Only one emoticon?! You're slipping, buddy. :-( Or maybe you're finally starting to grow up? :think