Why did Pacquiao lose to Morales?

BigReg made this thread as a bait to get pacquiao fans to say something stupid. You guys should just ignore it and let it be.

Only the most ******ed boxing fans think every boxer who has a loss is spent or shitty.

Only thing a 0 on your record shows is that you didn't fight anyone yet.

 

Yeah, Morales was much better. That's why he lost a trilogy to Barrera, who Pac absolutely wiped out, and that's why Morales in his prime had to go to war with guys of the calibre of Wayne McCullough (Erik beat him 8-4 in a very competitive battle), whereas Pac in his prime demolishes guys like Miguel Cotto, despite giving away weight. atsch

You guys need to take off your love-goggles when it comes to warrior Morales, and open your eyes to the difference in quality here.

 

Shut yo bitchass up and get back! You still rattled huh?:rofl

The **** you gone do ***** boy!

 

There was nothing easy about it. It was a very competitive, very exciting fight where both guys took punishment. It was scored 115-113 and that was about right, so that doesn't show a fight where anyone did anything 'with ease'.

 

But what if Morales was a southpaw just like Pacquiao?

 

It would've been about 8 rounds to 4 if Morales hadn't given that last round away... and I said he backed Pacquiao up with ease due to his size advantage not that the fight itself was all that easy. Learn to read you sensitive ass *******.

 

Look at all the butt-hurt Pacfans turn up.

 

Manny did get clearly outboxed, though there were a couple of things that broke his concentration during the fight most notably the gloves, and secondarily the butt in rd 5, it would have been a closer match had those variables not existed, but theres nothing we can change about that.

Morales had his head in it more.

 

Ooooo I guess I can't do anything to you internet tough guy. Schooling me with you mad hard game over the internet. You have me shuddering in my shorts you hard ass internet gangsta.

:yep:rofl:rofl:yep:rofl:yep

 

LMAO:rofl Shut yo bitchass up! Nobody is cliaming to be tough but thanks for the comment...Weak ass *****!

 

:rofl

No ****.

 

Why would it have been 8-4?? Why would Morales have automatically been awarded the last round if he didn't switch his stance?? He was 7-4 up going into the last, but Pac knew he had to win that round to have a chance on the cards, the way he fought the last round he could easily have been the one to win it even if Morales hadn't switched stance. 7-4 going into the last is not an easy fight, and Pac beat him up in the last anyway, it was a close, competitive and brilliant fight.

Morales didn't back Pac up with ease anyway, that's BS, they both tore into each other early, and both backed each other up at times. Morales won more rounds because of his better jab and better boxing, not because he bullied Pac with size and strength. Have you even seen the fight or have you just read about it? Go watch it you sensitive ass ********.

 

And tell your ***** boy friend to get back!:good

 

Oh STFU you whiny fan groupie... :rofl :roll: ****ing fluffers, man. They had THREE FIGHTS. Pacquiao would have won NONE of those matches if Morales wasn't SHOT. Common sense isn't your strong suit, is it? :roll: Did I make any reference to Pacquiao's "peak" or "prime?" NO. IDIOT. I DID NOT.

 

10z gloves for 130lbers is quite stupid... it gave a huge advantage to Morales that night. He was also just overall, the better boxer that night... Pacman got better after that fight