Why did Pacquiao lose to Morales?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, Apr 15, 2010.


  1. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    Erik simply was the better fighter that night...

    This content is protected



    This content is protected



    This content is protected



    This content is protected



    This content is protected



    This content is protected
     
  2. fytelod

    fytelod Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,310
    1
    Nov 17, 2009
    Pacquiao was defeated since he first tried to bulldoze the granite chinned Morales in the early rounds. He adjusted late in the fight but he's still one point short of achieving a draw.
     
  3. DAGOBOY

    DAGOBOY Active Member Full Member

    1,330
    0
    Oct 6, 2007
    had to be the blood draw. it weakened him so much. he has never lost a fight since then. think about that. and the other fights was only because he was too young and inexperienced. since then the only thing that could hurt him was a blood draw.

    FACT!

    really though the reason is simply morales was the better man that night.
     
  4. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    You're sensative, like a woman Popkins. The gloves, and the blood testing the day before are two well known reasons given for why Pacquiao lost that fight. If you want to make a thread about the Mayweather/Castillo fight, go right ahead. I'll be more than willing to disscuss the actual fight.
     
  5. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Another overemotional one. Why can't some of you guys just discuss the fight?
     
  6. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    130 lbers. are not allowed to use 10 oz. gloves. 8 oz. gloves were used for the fight. The dispute about the gloves had to do with the brand, not the size.
     
  7. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    You know I'm right, stop playing stupid.
     
  8. haglerwon

    haglerwon Official GTMSBT Marquez Full Member

    218
    0
    May 1, 2009
    I wasn't 100% convinced he did. I thought it was just one of those great, close fights that could have gone either way.
     
  9. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Come on homie, when has that bitchass dude ever discussed anything worth a damn?
     
  10. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    You're not right. Like many oversensitive posters on here, you simply invent agendas that don't exist. Pacquiao fanatics don't need my prodding to say something stupid.
     
  11. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    I wrote an article on this tired ass topic. Why the **** would I engage you clowns about it anymore?

    You still haven't produced a solid argument for any of your perceived theories.

    Witch hunt homos.
     
  12. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    "Why did pacquiao lose to Morales"

    I will go start a thread: "Why did castillo lose to mayweather in the first fight" and stir up just as much stupid ****.

    Quit acting like you're not completely transparent on this one.
     
  13. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :-(( Go tell somebody that gives a ****!
     
  14. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Should I log onto WoW and start telling the mayweather fans on there?
     
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Rational fans know that the point of this thread is to show that Morales won because he was the better man that night. Pacquiao lost because he wasn't good enough at the time. Freddy Roach admitted as much. He says that fight was the turning point in Pacquiao's career. It made Roach realize that he needed to add more dimensions to Pacquiao's game. There's no shame in losing to Morales. Pacquiao and his team learned a lot that night, and no, what they learned had nothing to do with gloves or blood tests.

    You don't lose fights because of gloves. If Pacquiao and Roach really believed this, Pacquiao wouldn't be where he is now. That fight was an important night for both fighters. That's somehow lost on many people as they are too obsessed with focusing on bull**** that had nothing to do with the outcome of the fight.