Why did The Greatest lose to basically a one-armed fighter?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ChrisPontius, Sep 27, 2007.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,117
    45,127
    Apr 27, 2005

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  2. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Yes but let's be honest, Frazier rarely did significant damage with a punch other than the left hook. No doubt Johansson could throw a mean uppercut but it was always his right hand that did the damage.


    Obviously i was exaggarating a bit, but the reason i posted this is because at my gym, a trainer was telling someone: "all you do is throw right hands, you may beat a few people in sparring here with it, but a good skilled boxer is going to take you apart if you're so limited". Frazier proved that was pretty much untrue as he took one of the best boxers ever apart over 15 rounds using the same tactic over and over.
     
  3. NickHudson

    NickHudson Active Member Full Member

    894
    21
    Apr 13, 2007
    Further to what the other posters have said about Frazier's endurance and other physical qualities, I would also add another stylistic one.

    As well as being a fast and powerful left hook, it was also a punch that was deceptive. Frazier was very good at throwing the hook tight as well as wide, but he never telegraphed his punches.
     
  4. Strangely Brown

    Strangely Brown Member Full Member

    120
    0
    Sep 22, 2006
    It was more to do with Frazier's constant pressuring. Post '67 Ali's legs didn't keep him out of trouble as easy and basically he allowed Frazier to pummel away at him, winning rounds and wearing him down further.

    A pre-exile Ali may well have been able to keep out of the way of Frazier and expose Joe's own faults a lot easier ( I suspect a mid-fight stoppage in Ali's favour if a prime Frazier fought a prime Ali).
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,802
    29,241
    Jun 2, 2006
    Great analysis!:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I have to disagree. Ali was pinned on the ropes by Chuvalo. He fought a lot of stiff competition in his first career, guys that were nowhere near the class of Frazier or past it, or couldn't pressure him. Folley has a ridiculously bad chin and was old, Terrel didn't do much at all (eye problem) except surviving the distance, Floyd had a bad back, and Cooper, Mildenberger, Chuvalo....

    Frazier would've forced Ali to do things he'd never done before. And i think Ali is never gonna stop a prime Frazier.

    Why i believe that is because the '71 Ali was a bit bigger, seemed to punch a bit harder, threw his hardest shots and sat down on all of them for 5 rounds when Frazier was slow, and couldn't even hurt him or keep him off him. If he's gonna beat a prime Frazier it's gonna be on points, but running from Frazier is simply not gonna work. In my opinion. Frazier is not a Folley, a shot Williams or a Terrel who follows you around like a zombie.
     
  7. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006




    :tired
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,802
    29,241
    Jun 2, 2006
    Liston had a great left hook ,so did Patterson,,they didnt do so well.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,802
    29,241
    Jun 2, 2006
    When you are fighting a guy nearly 4 inches smaller who fight s out of a crouch ,a lot of your punches are going over his head,and,if he is a good hooker ,when you uppercut him ,or try to,you are very vulnerable to the hook.Not only Alis jaw took punishment ,he had contusions on his hips from Fraziers incessant hooks.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,117
    45,127
    Apr 27, 2005
    The fact of the matter is that post exile Ali lost a lot of mobility and some speed, reflex and stamina among other things. I reckon you'd agree that the earlier version of Ali wouldn't have been in the pocket anywhere near as often. Personally, like you i am not convinced of this weakness.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,802
    29,241
    Jun 2, 2006
    Fraziers biggest weapon was his left hook Alis was his legs,against Frazier he didnt have them,imo if Ali had fought Joe in his prime ,and I mean during those 3 years he was banned he would have been 3 - 0 against him.Still not at his best ,against a man in his prime,who fought the fight of his life ,he gave Frazier hell and hospitalized him,wonderful performances by both men.
     
  12. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
    It´s really no criticism or so, but IMO the 60s-version of Ali was really quicker on his feet, but his chin/ physical wasn´t the same like later when he got stronger and more muscular. IMO this version of Ali would get KO´d against Frazier...
     
  13. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,117
    45,127
    Apr 27, 2005
    Agreed.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,117
    45,127
    Apr 27, 2005
    Frazier was as good as he ever got, Ali wasn't.

    :good
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,802
    29,241
    Jun 2, 2006
    Cooper caught Ali by throwing 3 jabs ,which Ali backed away from rather than slipping the problem was that the ropes were behind him ,so there was nowhere to go the ropes contributed to his kd ,but they may also have helped him as he had a gentle drop rather than a concussive thud onto the canvas,I dont but it that if the kd had happenend earlier he would have been kod,he was up quick a bit groggy but not out of it.Howard Davis seemmed to me to have a morbid fear of being tagged ,and was allways going in reverse as he delivered a punch ,even a jab,he had talent but lacked abit of ticker,imo,skill wise he should have beaten Watt,but he didnt have the grit for it.