Why did the K's never fight Holyfield

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by andrewa1, Jan 6, 2016.


  1. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    Rahman was a mandatory, who took the place of Povetkin who pulled out. Rahman was the next available ranked contender. Not Wlad's fault

    Vitali had to retire with several injuries which required surgery and rehab, that's hardly running.
     
  2. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Rahman was sent in by the IBF as Povetkin ducked Wlad. Klitschko didn't handpick Rahman, but the IBF sent him in.

     
  3. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    How's that egg on your face Eggman?
     
  4. Eggman

    Eggman "The cream of the crop! Nobody does it better! Full Member

    4,332
    3,778
    Dec 2, 2015
    Egg on my face? So what it was a mando. You don't think wlad could have had any sway in this?? He was a replacement.

    My point stands. The klitschkos both have no problems fighting old legends when it suits them. You could write a list for both. Holyfield was a lose-lose.
     
  5. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,963
    Jul 21, 2012
    Thats what Vitali said.

    Yet both of them built their careers off the names of faded Contenders from the 90's era.

    Losing by second round KO to a faded perennial contender in Wlads case.:rofl:oops:
     
  6. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,144
    Apr 4, 2012
    None of these'old legends' were much older than Wlad is now or Vit when he retired, Eggmutt. Only diff is they did not exit as faded and beat up bums like your heroes.
     
  7. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,963
    Jul 21, 2012
    :rofl:yep

    Funny because its 100% true. Watch those fights again.

    Wlad ran for his life against Peter. And he did so much holding , Harlod Ledderman was calling for him to be DQ'd. He couldn't out box a skill-less , plodding , swinging cave man.

    Toney out boxed Peter easily laying on the ropes for the entire night.
    A faded , old , out of shape , blown up Middle weight Toney to add insult to injury.

    But Wlad getting knocked all over the place and had no answer apart from excessive mauling and grappling.

    Thats the 'prime' Wlad who would beat Fury in one round:nut:rofl
     
  8. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,963
    Jul 21, 2012
    Holyfield was Wlads age against Lewis and he put more effort into one round than Wlad put into the entire 12 against Fury.
    Thats heart . Wlad never had none.
     
  9. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,740
    81,055
    Aug 21, 2012
    This. Beating Holyfield's corpse would have added nothing to their resume's except for the name.
     
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,740
    81,055
    Aug 21, 2012
    Anybody who thinks Holyfield had anything left in the tank for either Klitschko at that stage of his career needs their head read. They would have sent him to the morgue. Prime Holy ... a different story.
     
  11. lewis gassed

    lewis gassed The Bronze Dosser Full Member

    25,429
    19,508
    Nov 24, 2013
    Holyfield was shot against Lewis, K2 had no business fighting him and I'm glad they didn't.
     
  12. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,144
    Apr 4, 2012

    Holyfield was 36.5, not 39 and had only 39 fights, not 67. As for more effort, your opinion. Anyway.. :hi:
     
  13. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,963
    Jul 21, 2012
    And Holyfield endured more combat in those 39 fights than Wlad did in his 67.
     
  14. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,144
    Apr 4, 2012


    That's because Wlad hit way way harder as his 80 KO% demonstrates, and Vitali. 87% KO's. Highest in history. :hi:


    :rofl Half that 39 were cw fights. :rofl
     
  15. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Right, the K's were terrified of Holyfield, he would have destroyed them.

    Anyone else? I think one of the K hater trolls mentioned Briggs. It's another example of how weird it is they never faced Evander. Briggs was equally shot, probably more of an actual threat because of his power, but much less of a name and probably less of a draw.

    Did they just respect Holyfield that much more that they didn't want to embarrass him? Again, I think it was a mistake. Holyfield wanted the fight, would have been grateful for the opportunity (and money) even if he got destroyed. And they would have been able to say, "I beat an ATG", at least in the same way that Holmes, Tyson, Johnson were able to.

    Seriously, that is the reason many people rate those three fighters above the K's. Their records were otherwise much less impressive than either Klitschko (with Holmes the possible exception). Do the K's just not care about boxer blogger culture:yikes