Why did the K's never fight Holyfield

And he was mandatory. If Holyfield was mandatory then Wlad would have fought him.

 

Logic doesn't work with Dino.

 

My mistake. Wlad fought Rahman SIX years after he was beaten by old Evander:rofl

And he was not a mandatory. Povetkin was , but he withdrew on an injury.

Rahman was Vitali's mandatory back in 2005 but Vitali chose to avoid that fight.

Raham was never Wlads mandatory.

 

Because of injury you idiot. Vitali lost $30m from that pullout.

 

This content is protected

 

I've read his biography clown. Vitali retired in 2004 due to injury, you think he did not want to defend against Rahman and collect an easy $30m and not retire? Anyway, you remain a clown and idiot.

 

This content is protected

 

He was when Wlad fought him. IBF made Rahman the mandatory after Povetkin pulled out :deal

 

They certainly did not.

Rahman fought no eliminators or beat anybody ranked to get a title shot.

He wasn't a mandatory defence.

 

Read Vitali's biography, Dumbohelmet. I'm sure you'll enjoy it, German translation and all.

 

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Wladimir_Klitschko_vs._Hasim_Rahman

With IBF mandatory challenger Alexander Povetkin injured, fourth-ranked Hasim Rahman was the leading available contender and, therefore, counted as Klitschko's mandatory defense.

Any questions? :deal

 

Now watch Dinomoron go quiet for a while and then spew the exact same garbage on a different thread. :rofl

 

He's nothing if not tenacious. Like an OCD arm-cutter.

 

Thats not an official source.

Being drafted in on a weeks notice doesn't make him a mando. What eliminators did he win?

 

Is that official from the IBF website?