Why did you remove Bernard Hopkins from your P4P list in the 1st place?

I have him on my list at either 4 or 5.

 

does this mean Calzaghe gets some credit from yank boxing fans?

 

I'm not sure. Can you remind me again, is he black?

 

Nah, he's albino. You can easily tell by the lack of skills, the over-the-top management and his spending 90% of his career fighting Euro-bums. Black fighters can't get away with that blatant crap. atsch Hopkins P4P=4

 

If you got Hopkins in there, you should have PAscal in there. Pascal is coming off a win over Dawson and a draw against Hopkins.

 

That DOES NOT comprise a P4P candidate body of work.

 

Pavlik, Tarver & Pascal are all B level fighters, the only A level p4p fighter B-Hop has fought in the past 4 years is Calzaghe and he got outclassed by a wide margin.

Joe gave him such a beat down that the American judges, for once, had to give the foreign fighter the decison - and that is unheard of in America.

 

Pascal is not a p4p fighter. That is clear whenever he fights.

 

Exactly my thinking. His last loss was against Roy Jones in the early 90's.

 

So Hopkins, Dawson are clear not as well. Cause last time I check, Pascal won against Dawson and had a draw on Hopkins. Also he was the only boxer to fold Hopkins knees in 16 years.

If you take away every single credit of Pascal, you have to taking away credit of your boxers then.