Why do certain guys ALWAYS bring up COTTO's loss to Margarito time after time?.......

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by venomus_p4p, May 24, 2009.


  1. Capitan

    Capitan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,938
    55
    Jul 28, 2008


    Whats up with all the hostility?

    Lets hear some logic!!!!
     
  2. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    I know the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' is unheard of in your neck of the woods, dungbeetle, but in a decent, democratic and just society, the onus is on the prosecution to prove beyond all reasonable doubt the guilt of the accused.

    You are unable to back up your claims, therefore you are a lying sodomite dungbeetle and you should be forced to retract your statement just like you re-ingest your mother's feces.

    How do you like them horseapples, dickhead? :yep
     
  3. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :lol:

    mental giant, this bloke
     
  4. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    I come from a land and time where a man stands by his words.

    Dungbeetle claims Margarito used loaded gloves against Cotto.

    I asked him to provide evidence of this claim, which he cannot do.

    LOGIC: ergo, he is not telling the truth, ergo he is a liar.

    He is a lying dungbeetle.

    There is no evidence to suggest Margo used loaded gloves against Cotto, but there is plenty of conspiracy theories in this thread, and dungbeetle is fueling them with his wild and dishonest claims.
     
  5. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Racist wild boar exposed again. I'll ask you one last time before you pack your bags and head off to the "Post your pictures thread" in the lounge to play the failing mascot that you are. DO YOU HAVE ANY PROOF THAT HE DIDN'T?

    Starbucks waiters have attitudes these days.
     
  6. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Two responses to one post, someone is taking things way too personal. :rofl
     
  7. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Again with the race card - once again, you resort to pathetically playing the victim when you cannot back up your cheap words.

    Do I have ANY PROOF THAT HE DIDN'T? :lol: Yes, I know you fancy yourself as judge, jury and executioner, but sorry pal, that's not how we do things around here.

    "Innocent until proven guilty", dungbeetle.

    Are you denying the very foundation that free society is built upon?

    There is no evidence that Margarito used loaded gloves against Cotto.

    Are you going to retract your lies, you whoring dungbeetle?
     
  8. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Nope, not me.

    I just like exposing LIARS.

    Eh dungbeetle? LIARS :lol:

    Lying ***** of Babylon :lol:
     
  9. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    Cotto got his ass kicked by the better on the night Tony Margarito the sooner you accept that the better. If Cotto thought there was really foul play in the first fight he'd be screaming for a rematch to get revenge not begging for Margarito to be banned for life :nono
     
  10. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Prove that there is no evidence he did, how do you know he didn't?

    We know that you're not good enough to even carry Margarito's spit bucket in the corner so don't try to hint anything there. Do you have any reliable proof that he didn't?, you do realise that he got banned because they OBVIOUSLY assumed that he used it in previous fights. Even guys like Lampley who make a living watching and analyzing boxing fights immediately brought up the Cotto fight as it's the first to come in anyone's mind. A useless forum troll like yourself is doing nothing but trying hard enough to turn this into a keyboard "personal insults!!" war because you know where you will end up if it this went far as a boxing discussion. We hardly exchanged more than two posts and you're getting personal already. :lol:

    And yes you were clearly being racist with your post as you were when you got your ass banned. This indirect **** isn't working really.

    Either stick to boxing or keep the personal attacks for your mother as they don't bother me one bit, just makes me laugh at your pathetic sexually frustrated position.
     
  11. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    This content is protected
     
  12. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    I see you still can't provide evidence to back up your claim, and continue to ask me to prove he DIDN'T use loaded gloves against Cotto.

    That clearly makes no logical sense - here, a demonstration:

    "Floyd Mayweather Junior was on steroids when he beat Ricky Hatton. It still took him 10 rounds to stop him, which shows you just how bad he really is."

    Can you prove he wasn't?
     
  13. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    FAIL :lol:
     
  14. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Yes I can, tests are always taken after fights and if he was negative it would have been reported like it does with many other fights.

    Your turn to answer my question now, please prove that he wasn't loaded against Margarito seeing as Richardson was the one who spotted it like he did for Trinidad and he obviously wasn't in Cotto's corner.
     
  15. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Sorry, couldn't find a picture of someone more obese.