Why do i dislike amir khan so much!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by WILLOWONE, Feb 22, 2011.


  1. rccwilliams

    rccwilliams Sippin' on some sizzurp Full Member

    2,549
    0
    Mar 5, 2009
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlWZusHLsNs[/ame]

    2:02

    :lol:
     
  2. The Chameleon Boxer

    The Chameleon Boxer Hot Prospect Full Member

    190
    1
    Jul 14, 2007
    So you don't like Khan because he's an "arrogant *****". Yes he does have some terrible PR skills and needs a crash course on this subject. But let's put things into perspective, let me list a few fighters who also talk as much or more **** than Khan.

    John Murray - Has always been bitter about Khan getting more exposure than him

    Degale - Have you seen his interviews

    Dirrell - He said Calzaghe was overrated in an interview

    Calzaghe likes to boast a lot

    Mayweather - No explanation

    Margarito (Freddie Parkinsons impressions)

    Hopkins - Loves to play the antagonist

    Maybe you're a newbie to boxing and your only exposure to boxing has been ITV, Sentanta and the odd Sky PPV, so you don't realise that boxing has an awful lot of talkers (some of them follow it up with actions).

    From Cassius Clay calling Sonny Liston 'ugly' to Mike Tyson saying he will eat Lennox Lewis' kids, boxing is as much showmanship as sport.

    I think Khan is fairly mild in terms of him being rude or bad mouthing his opponents. In fact, his opponents are mouthier to him. He always respects his opponents after a fight.

    I think he is ******ed at times, and comes out with things that are not supposed to be said, but he just says what's in his mind. Tyson Fury, Chisora have accomplished a fraction of what Khan has, yet talk more ****.

    So tell us the real reason you hate him son?
     
  3. TheDon

    TheDon KO Artist Full Member

    3,434
    1
    Apr 19, 2008
    Of the highest profile British boxers Khan is probably the least cocky. Froch and Haye are do it more and are MUCH better at it.
     
  4. WILLOWONE

    WILLOWONE Member Full Member

    140
    0
    Feb 21, 2011
    first of all boy am not your son,am no newbie to boxing and yes boxers do talk **** and trashtalk.my opinion is my opinion, amir khan as got some great skills don't get me wrong.it's nothing to do race or jealousy i've disliked liked him since he first come on the scene right through from the bailey fight to the present.I AGREE with what you are saying,Degale is the same(go on am a racist) and i did'nt expect him to deal with Paul Smith the way he did but what impressed me about that was it was only his ninth fight and he took him to school.now to me Amir Khan has Cherry picked(up until now,maybe he will step up properly) his way to a title now come on since his loss to Prescott his fights have been ***an (a teacher) barrera (shot and washed up) kotelnik (weakest of the champs at the time,no power) salita (please) malignaggi (could'nt knock a fly of shite) then onto Maidana (who is,his strongest opponent to date but still has to prove himself).Know we all know who he fought in the build up to these fights NO-ONE thats who.so that's why i don't like him, he as people sucking his arse for what,yes he has skills but who has he really fought. yet he's the best light-welterweight in the world.
     
  5. The Chameleon Boxer

    The Chameleon Boxer Hot Prospect Full Member

    190
    1
    Jul 14, 2007
    Khan has 25 fights. You named a few of his opponents.

    Who had Ricky Hatton fought on his 25h fight? John Bailey

    Kevin Mitchell fought Carl Johansson on his 26th fight

    Who has John Murray fought after 30 fights?

    Calzaghe only had washed Eubank after 25 fights.

    Now Khan let's compare Khan

    ***an
    barrera
    kotelnik
    salita
    malignaggi
    Maidana

    So your argument for Khan fighting nobodies is weak. Khan will continue to improve his quality of opposition over his next 5/6 fights.

    So tell us, do you dislike other British fighters with padded records?
     
  6. Tully

    Tully Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,803
    0
    Mar 28, 2010
    Hateful mother f*cker!

    You are in the right place

    Welcome
     
  7. Ant68

    Ant68 Active Member Full Member

    1,030
    1
    Dec 28, 2010
    Higher than Devon. :rasta
     
  8. WILLOWONE

    WILLOWONE Member Full Member

    140
    0
    Feb 21, 2011
    weak in what way,you tell me a fighter who as been blown away inside 50 seconds of the first round and then got a chance to go and win a legit title only two fights later.only to go and leave a guy(frank warren) who as invested a **** load of time and effort in him even after this blowout to swan off to goldenboy with a title!!!these arguments could go round in circles forever....
     
  9. WILLOWONE

    WILLOWONE Member Full Member

    140
    0
    Feb 21, 2011
    thank you very much my good friend,i am happy to have joined this forum of madness.
     
  10. The Chameleon Boxer

    The Chameleon Boxer Hot Prospect Full Member

    190
    1
    Jul 14, 2007
    First it was his attitude
    Then it was that he had **** opposition
    Now it's because he got KO'ed in 50 seconds and then got a title shot and ditched Frank Warren for bigger fights.

    I think you're contradicting yourself now. You criticised his lack of opposition, yet Warren was a key decision maker in the opposition Khan had. He ditched Warren and joined GBP because Schaefer is more willing to provide a higher quality pf opponents and let Khan take risks. If he was with Warren, you would be criticising the quality of his opposition even more.

    In terms of getting KO'ed in 54 seconds, most fighters would have given up. Where's Kevin Mitchell. Khan got humiliated by a one dimensional slugger yet still had the balls to be macho against an even harder puncher in Maidana. That's something to respect him for, regardless of how chinny he may be.

    So again, tell us your real reason?:****